Acupuncture Therapy for Extremity Musculoskeletal Pain: A Clinically Focused Evidence Synthesis with Therapeutic Implications

Zhu et al. · Journal of Pain Research · 2025

📊Evidence Synthesis👥n=19 studies includedHigh Clinical Impact

Evidence Level

MODERATE
78/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture for extremity musculoskeletal pain across 4 specific conditions

👥

WHO

Adults with lateral epicondylitis, carpal tunnel syndrome, patellofemoral pain, and plantar fasciitis

⏱️

DURATION

Review of studies from January 2015 to June 2024

📍

POINTS

Varied by condition: ah shi points, BL-57, KI-3, BL-60 for plantar fasciitis; trigger points for patellofemoral pain

🔬 Study Design

1500participants
randomization

RCTs included

n=10

Different acupuncture modalities

Systematic reviews included

n=9

Acupuncture meta-analyses

⏱️ Duration: 9-year retrospective analysis

📊 Results in numbers

Pain reduction MD -1.77 points

Strongest evidence for plantar fasciitis

Moderate short-term improvement

Benefit for lateral epicondylitis

Insufficient for recommendation

Limited evidence for carpal tunnel syndrome

Short- to medium-term benefit

Patellofemoral pain

Percentage highlights

Moderate short-term improvement
Benefit for lateral epicondylitis
Short- to medium-term benefit
Patellofemoral pain

📊 Outcome Comparison

Evidence level by condition

Plantar fasciitis
85
Lateral epicondylitis
70
Patellofemoral pain
60
Carpal tunnel syndrome
35
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study shows that acupuncture can be a safe and effective option for joint and muscle pain in the arms and legs. The most promising results are for heel pain and tennis elbow, offering an alternative to conventional medications with few side effects.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Musculoskeletal pain in the extremities of the arms and legs represents one of the leading health problems worldwide, affecting millions of people and causing significant limitations in quality of life. This condition includes problems such as tendinitis (inflammation of the tendons), carpal tunnel syndrome, knee pain, and plantar fasciitis. Conventional treatments, such as anti-inflammatories, corticosteroid injections, and physical therapy, often offer only temporary relief and may produce significant side effects. Anti-inflammatories can cause gastrointestinal and cardiovascular problems, while repeated corticosteroid injections can accelerate tissue degeneration.

Faced with these limitations, acupuncture has emerged as a promising therapeutic alternative, increasingly integrated into conventional medical care because of its potential to provide pain relief with minimal risk.

This research aimed to scientifically evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of extremity musculoskeletal pain. The investigators carried out a comprehensive search of recognized medical databases, analyzing studies published between January 2015 and June 2024. Only high-quality studies were included, such as randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews, involving adults diagnosed with specific conditions: lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow), carpal tunnel syndrome, patellofemoral pain syndrome (knee pain), and plantar heel pain syndrome (plantar fasciitis). The rigorous methodology yielded 19 relevant studies, including 10 clinical trials and 9 systematic reviews, which were analyzed narratively to extract evidence on the efficacy of different acupuncture modalities.

The results revealed important differences in the efficacy of acupuncture depending on the condition treated and the technique used. For lateral epicondylitis, manual acupuncture showed short-term benefits, while dry needling demonstrated superior long-term effects, especially when combined with other therapies. In carpal tunnel syndrome, the evidence was insufficient and contradictory, with many studies showing a high risk of methodological bias, precluding consistent recommendations. For patellofemoral pain syndrome, dry needling of trigger points produced short- to medium-term pain relief, although its added value within multimodal therapies was inconsistent.

The most promising results were observed in plantar heel pain syndrome, where both electroacupuncture and dry needling produced significant improvements in pain and function, with benefits sustained for more than three months. Importantly, all studies reported that acupuncture produced few adverse events, limited mainly to mild pain at the application site.

For patients and clinicians, these findings have important clinical implications. Acupuncture emerges as a safe, low-risk therapeutic option that can be considered as part of comprehensive treatment strategies, particularly for patients who have not responded adequately to conventional therapy or who seek alternatives to medications. For conditions such as plantar fasciitis and lateral epicondylitis, acupuncture can be recommended with greater confidence, supported by more robust evidence. Patients with knee pain may benefit from short-term dry needling, while those with carpal tunnel syndrome should be informed that current evidence is limited.

It is essential that acupuncture be integrated into a multimodal treatment plan, individualized to each patient's needs, preferences, and characteristics, and always delivered by qualified, experienced clinicians.

The study has several important limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. Methodological heterogeneity among the included studies — including different acupuncture protocols, point selection, treatment frequency, and duration — makes direct comparisons difficult. Many included studies had limited methodological quality and small samples, yielding evidence of low to moderate certainty under rigorous scientific criteria. In addition, the search was restricted to English-language publications, potentially excluding relevant studies from other regions.

The investigators emphasize the need for larger future studies with standardized protocols and direct comparisons between different acupuncture modalities. Despite these limitations, the findings suggest that acupuncture is a valuable therapeutic option within the treatment armamentarium for extremity musculoskeletal pain, offering hope to patients seeking safe and effective alternatives for the management of painful conditions.

Strengths

  • 1Comprehensive synthesis of recent evidence
  • 2Condition-specific analysis
  • 3Evaluation of different acupuncture modalities
  • 4Practical recommendations for clinicians
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Heterogeneity among included studies
  • 2Variable quality of primary studies
  • 3Limited to English-language publications
  • 4Non-standardized acupuncture protocols
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

Extremity musculoskeletal pain accounts for a substantial share of visits to rehabilitation and pain services, and clinicians frequently encounter patients refractory to conventional pharmacologic options or with contraindications to prolonged use of NSAIDs and corticosteroids. By stratifying the evidence by specific condition, this synthesis offers a more actionable decision map than generic acupuncture reviews. For plantar fasciitis and lateral epicondylitis, the level of evidence already supports incorporating acupuncture and dry needling as first-line components of multimodal protocols — not merely as rescue measures. Patients with comorbidities that limit NSAID use, competitive athletes who avoid repeated injections, and patients with established chronic pain are the most immediate candidates. The distinction between manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture, and dry needling across conditions is what sets this work apart for clinical prescribing.

Notable Findings

The most robust finding of this synthesis is the effect size for plantar fasciitis — a mean difference of -1.77 points on the pain scale, with benefits sustained beyond three months for both electroacupuncture and dry needling. This durability of effect is clinically relevant in a condition that is notoriously recurrent and difficult to manage long term. For lateral epicondylitis, the temporal separation is revealing: manual acupuncture favors short-term outcomes, while dry needling shows superiority at longer follow-up, especially in combined regimens — a finding that directly guides technique selection according to the stage of the clinical course. Patellofemoral pain syndrome shows favorable short- and medium-term response to trigger-point needling, although the incremental benefit within multimodal therapies is variable. The silence of the evidence for carpal tunnel syndrome is also informative for practice: there is insufficient basis for routine indication in this condition.

From My Experience

In my practice at the Pain Center, chronic plantar fasciitis is probably the extremity condition in which I most often use electroacupuncture as a central strategy, and the data from this synthesis closely reflect what I have observed over the years. I typically see meaningful VAS reduction between the third and fifth session, with stabilization of functional gains between the eighth and twelfth session — after which the patient generally enters a monthly maintenance protocol combined with eccentric plantar exercise and footwear guidance. For lateral epicondylitis, I have reserved dry needling specifically for cases with an active trigger-point component in the extensor carpi radialis, often combining it with neural mobilization and progressive muscle strengthening. The profile that responds best is the patient with predominantly myofascial pain, without significant neuropathic involvement and without advanced degenerative tendinopathy on ultrasound. For carpal tunnel syndrome, I have for some time avoided indicating acupuncture as a primary measure — I favor surgery or ultrasound-guided injection according to the electroneuromyographic grade, and the data from this review reinforce that caution.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Journal of Pain Research · 2025

DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S551446

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.