Skip to content

Does Acupuncture Hurt? A Retrospective Study on Pain and Satisfaction during Pediatric Acupuncture

Gold et al. · Children · 2023

📊Retrospective Cohort Study👥n=230 patientsHigh Clinical Impact

Evidence Level

MODERATE
72/ 100
Quality
3/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
3/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether acupuncture causes pain during needling and to measure satisfaction in pediatric patients

👥

WHO

230 pediatric patients aged 8 to 21 years with chronic pain

⏱️

DURATION

5 years of data collection (2009-2013); 1 to 71 sessions per patient

📍

POINTS

Kiiko Matsumoto style with individualized points based on active reflexes

🔬 Study Design

230participants
randomization

1 session

n=66

Kiiko Matsumoto-style acupuncture

2-3 sessions

n=69

Kiiko Matsumoto-style acupuncture

4-6 sessions

n=42

Kiiko Matsumoto-style acupuncture

7+ sessions

n=53

Kiiko Matsumoto-style acupuncture

⏱️ Duration: Median of 3 sessions per patient

📊 Results in numbers

1.3/10

Pain during needling

0%

Patients with no pain

8.4/10

Overall satisfaction

8.2/10

Relaxation

7.7/10

Anxiety reduction

Percentage highlights

57.7%
Patients with no pain

📊 Outcome Comparison

Overall Satisfaction by Number of Sessions

1 session
8.04
2-3 sessions
8.22
4-6 sessions
9.04
7+ sessions
9.37

Needling Pain by Number of Sessions

1 session
1.33
2-3 sessions
1.55
4-6 sessions
1.41
7+ sessions
1.24
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study showed that acupuncture is essentially painless in children and adolescents — more than half of patients reported no pain at all during treatment. Young patients were highly satisfied with acupuncture and felt more relaxed and less anxious. The more sessions they completed, the more satisfied they became, while pain remained minimal.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Pain is one of the main concerns that keeps children and adolescents away from acupuncture, even when this therapy could provide significant benefits for the treatment of chronic painful conditions. Many parents, patients, and even clinicians avoid considering pediatric acupuncture because of concerns that needles will cause additional discomfort to children who are already suffering with pain. Although studies demonstrate the safety and efficacy of acupuncture in children for various types of pain, including chronic pain, migraines, and sickle cell pain, few works have specifically investigated how much the application of needles actually bothers young patients during the procedure.

The main aim of this study was to investigate the real-world experience of children and adolescents during acupuncture sessions, with particular focus on pain caused by needle insertion, while also assessing levels of satisfaction, relaxation, and anxiety reduction. The researchers also wanted to understand whether the number of acupuncture sessions influenced these perceptions over time. To this end, they retrospectively analyzed data from 230 unique patients (ages 8 to 21 years) who took part in a total of 1,380 acupuncture sessions at a pediatric pain clinic between 2009 and 2013. All patients were treated with the Kiiko Matsumoto style of Japanese acupuncture, known for being a gentler technique that uses very fine needles inserted superficially.

After each session, patients completed standardized questionnaires evaluating needling pain with the Faces Pain Scale-Revised, plus questions on overall satisfaction, relaxation, and anxiety reduction on 1-to-10 scales.

The results were surprisingly positive and reassuring. The mean pain related to needle insertion was just 1.3 on a 0-to-10 scale, with 57.7% of patients reporting absolutely no pain during their first acupuncture session. Another 28% reported only mild pain (score 2 out of 10). This means that approximately 87% of young patients experienced minimal or no pain during the procedure.

In addition, patients showed high satisfaction with treatment, with a mean score of 8.4 out of 10, felt relaxed (mean 8.2 out of 10), and experienced significant anxiety reduction (mean 7.7 out of 10). About 68% of patients reported that acupuncture helped decrease their existing pain, while only 3.1% reported no pain reduction.

For patients and clinicians, these findings have very important practical implications. First, they refute the myth that acupuncture is painful for children, providing concrete evidence that the vast majority of young patients do not experience significant pain during treatment. This may encourage more families to consider acupuncture as part of an integrated treatment plan for pediatric chronic pain. The study also revealed that patients who completed more sessions (four or more) reported even higher levels of satisfaction, relaxation, and anxiety reduction, suggesting that the benefits of acupuncture may increase over time.

Importantly, needling-related pain remained consistently low regardless of the number of sessions, and only one mild adverse event was recorded throughout the study period. For clinicians, these data provide confidence to recommend acupuncture as a safe and well-tolerated therapeutic option, especially given the growing need for non-pharmacological alternatives for pain management in children.

The study presents some limitations that should be considered in interpreting the results. Because it is a retrospective analysis of clinical data, there is the possibility of selection bias, since patients dissatisfied with their first sessions probably did not return for additional treatments. In addition, the results apply specifically to the Kiiko Matsumoto style of Japanese acupuncture, which uses gentler techniques, and may not generalize to all types of acupuncture. The study also included only children aged 8 years and older, since this is the minimum age for reliable pain self-report.

Despite these limitations, the findings are consistent and based on a large and diverse sample of patients with different types of chronic pain. The researchers suggest that future studies include randomized controlled trials with control groups and comparisons with other integrative therapies. In conclusion, this study provides robust evidence that pediatric acupuncture is a well-tolerated, essentially painless, and highly satisfactory intervention for children and adolescents, and may be a valuable tool in the multidisciplinary management of pediatric chronic pain.

Strengths

  • 1Large sample of 230 pediatric patients
  • 2Multiple sessions analyzed (1,380 total)
  • 3Use of validated pain scales
  • 4Ethnically diverse population
  • 5Gentle Japanese acupuncture technique
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Retrospective study without control group
  • 2Possible selection bias — dissatisfied patients may have dropped out
  • 3Only one acupuncture technique tested
  • 4Limited to children aged 8 and older
  • 5Absence of baseline pain data
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

Fear of needles is, in practice, the main obstacle to recommending acupuncture in pediatric patients with chronic pain. These data from Gold et al. give the clinician an objective and concrete argument for the conversation with parents and patients: mean pain of 1.3/10 and complete absence of pain in more than half of first sessions are numbers that change the dynamic of the office visit. Populations that benefit directly include adolescents with chronic headache, functional musculoskeletal pain, and complex regional pain syndrome — common profiles in pediatric pain clinics where pharmacological alternatives are limited by toxicity and side effects. Integration with multidisciplinary pediatric chronic pain programs is the most immediate application: acupuncture becomes available as a non-pharmacological component without the burden of adding suffering to already vulnerable patients.

Notable Findings

The most robust data point of the study is the consistency of low pain across the 1,380 sessions analyzed — not just on the first experience, but sustained regardless of number of sessions completed. This suggests there is no procedural sensitization phenomenon, which would be biologically plausible in children with central chronic pain. The second finding that deserves attention is the upward trajectory of satisfaction, relaxation, and anxiety reduction as patients accumulate more sessions: those who completed four or more sessions showed progressively higher scores across these domains. This pattern points to a positive conditioning component — familiarity with the procedure amplifies the autonomic relaxation response. A score of 8.4/10 in overall satisfaction, in a pediatric population with habitually refractory chronic pain, is clinically meaningful and should not be underestimated.

From My Experience

In my practice with pediatric patients at the HC-FMUSP (Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo Medical School) Pain Center, the ritual of introducing the needles always precedes treatment itself — we show the instrument, explain the difference from blood-draw needles, and frequently perform a demonstration insertion on the accompanying caregiver. This preparation, combined with a gentle insertion technique like Matsumoto's, virtually eliminates avoidance behavior by the second session. I typically observe an initial analgesic response within three to four sessions in adolescents with chronic tension-type headache, and the gain in relaxation and mood regulation usually appears before pain improvement, which by itself sustains adherence. For maintenance, I generally work with cycles of eight to ten sessions followed by progressive spacing. I do not recommend acupuncture alone when there is an uninvestigated red flag or untreated major depression — in those cases, psychiatric treatment precedes or runs concurrently. The profile that responds best, in my experience, is the adolescent with functional pain, high somatic anxiety, and willingness to engage actively in treatment.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Children · 2023

DOI: 10.3390/children10111774

Access original article
CITED IN · 01 PAGE

Condition pages and clinical articles that cite this evidence as the basis of their recommendations.

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.