Effect of a single session of ear acupuncture on pain intensity and postural control in individuals with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
Ushinohama et al. · Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy · 2016
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
To assess whether a single session of auricular acupuncture reduces pain and improves balance in people with chronic low back pain
WHO
80 adults aged 18-50 years with chronic low back pain ≥12 weeks and intensity ≥4/10
DURATION
Single 20-minute session with immediate assessment
POINTS
3 auricular points: analgesic point (29), shenmen (40), and lumbar (55)
🔬 Study Design
Auricular acupuncture
n=40
Needles in 3 specific points for 20 minutes
Placebo
n=40
Switched-off ultrasound applied to the lumbar region
📊 Results in numbers
Pain reduction in auricular acupuncture group
Pain reduction in placebo group
Statistical significance of the difference
Blinded assessor accuracy rate
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Reduction in pain intensity
This study showed that a single session of auricular acupuncture (acupuncture on the ear) can temporarily reduce chronic low back pain. The relief was small but statistically significant compared to placebo, with no reported side effects.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
This Brazilian study investigated whether a single session of auricular acupuncture could reduce pain and improve balance in people with chronic low back pain. Low back pain is a highly prevalent health problem affecting millions of people worldwide, causing not only physical discomfort but also alterations in postural control and balance. Auricular acupuncture is a technique based on the premise that the human body is represented on the external ear as an inverted fetus, with specific points corresponding to different anatomical regions. Eighty adults aged between 18 and 50 years with chronic low back pain for at least 12 weeks and pain intensity of 4 or higher on a 0-to-10 scale were randomized into two groups.
The experimental group received auricular acupuncture with needles inserted at three specific points: analgesic point (point 29), shenmen point (point 40), and lumbar point (point 55). The control group received placebo treatment with switched-off ultrasound applied to the painful lumbar region. Both interventions lasted 20 minutes. Pain intensity was assessed before and immediately after treatment using a numerical scale from 0 to 10.
Postural control was assessed through balance tests on a force platform, with participants in different positions (parallel feet or semi-tandem) and visual conditions (eyes open or closed). Results showed that both groups had pain reduction after treatment, but reduction was significantly greater in the group receiving auricular acupuncture. The median pain reduction was 2 points in the auricular acupuncture group versus 1 point in the placebo group, a statistically significant difference (p=0.032). The effect size was considered small (r=0.21) according to Cohen's criteria.
Regarding postural control, no significant differences were found between groups, indicating that pain reduction was not sufficient to improve balance. This finding suggests that postural control alterations in people with chronic low back pain may be related to long-term neuroplastic changes in the postural control system, which are not immediately reversible with acute pain reduction. The study has important methodological strengths, including adequate randomization, assessor blinding (with an accuracy rate of only 56.25%, indicating successful blinding), appropriate sample size calculation, and intention-to-treat analysis. The only adverse event reported was dizziness in one participant in the auricular acupuncture group, which may or may not be related to the treatment.
The clinical implications are relevant, as they demonstrate that even a single session of auricular acupuncture can provide temporary relief of chronic low back pain. This is particularly important considering that auricular acupuncture has minimal side effects, is relatively inexpensive, and can be applied in various settings without requiring the patient to undress or remain lying down for long periods. Although the effect is small, it may be clinically useful as adjunctive therapy or in situations where analgesic medications cannot be used.
Strengths
- 1Rigorous methodology with adequate randomization and assessor blinding
- 2First assessment of single-session auricular acupuncture effects on postural control
- 3Sample size calculation based on prior evidence
- 4Intention-to-treat analysis and low risk of bias
Limitations
- 1Assessment of immediate effects only, with no long-term follow-up
- 2Sample with low disability level (mean RMDQ of 4.2/24)
- 3Absence of sham auricular acupuncture placebo group
- 4Small effect size for pain reduction
Expert Commentary
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai
PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo
▸ Clinical Relevance
Chronic low back pain remains one of the most frequent diagnoses in any pain clinic, and the search for low-risk interventions with immediate applicability is ongoing. This work by Ushinohama and colleagues, published in the Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, documents that a single session of auricular acupuncture with needles at three classic points — analgesic point (29), shenmen (40), and lumbar point (55) — produces a statistically significant reduction in pain compared to placebo, with a median reduction of 2 points on the numerical scale versus 1 point in the control group. For the physician integrating acupuncture into the therapeutic arsenal, the most immediate finding is the justification for using auricular acupuncture as an adjunctive resource for rapid relief: in patients awaiting specialist consultation, during intercurrent pain crises, in the preoperative period, or in scenarios where access to the acupuncture table is limited, the ear offers a practical, discreet, and quickly executed intervention pathway.
▸ Notable Findings
Two findings deserve particular attention. The first is the dissociation between analgesia and postural control: significant pain reduction did not translate into improved balance on the force platforms, in parallel-feet or semi-tandem positions, with or without vision. This result points to the neuroplastic nature of postural alterations in chronic low back pain — cortical and subcortical reorganizations that do not reverse with a single acute analgesic stimulus. It is a clinically honest finding and theoretically coherent with what we know about pain chronification. The second notable point is the success of assessor blinding, with an accuracy rate of only 56.25%, indistinguishable from chance, which strengthens the internal validity of the findings. The small effect size (r=0.21) is declared without euphemism by the authors, reflecting methodological maturity and guiding realistic clinical expectations.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice in the Acupuncture Group of the Pain Center at HC-FMUSP, auricular acupuncture rarely works as monotherapy in established chronic low back pain — but it is a valuable resource when integrated into a multimodal plan. I usually combine it with systemic acupuncture, especially in early phases of treatment, precisely to anticipate relief while the cumulative effect of systemic sessions is still building. I have observed that patients with a component of diffuse hyperalgesia or with a central sensitization profile respond well to auricular stimulation as additional modulation. For chronic low back pain with a low functional grade — a profile similar to this sample, with mean RMDQ of 4.2 — I expect a response in 2 to 3 sessions when using auricular acupuncture as an adjunct, and I work with a horizon of 8 to 12 sessions for consolidation. The patient profile that responds best, in my experience, is one with predominantly nociceptive pain and without a major component of kinesiophobia; in these cases, the rapid relief from auricular acupuncture serves as a motivational anchor for adherence to the rehabilitation program.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy · 2016
DOI: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0158
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories