Effect of Electroacupuncture (EA) and Manual Acupuncture (MA) on Markers of Inflammation in Knee Osteoarthritis
Shi et al. · Journal of Pain Research · 2020
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
To investigate how electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture affect inflammatory markers in patients with knee osteoarthritis
WHO
58 individuals aged 45–75 years with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis
DURATION
8 weeks of treatment, 3 sessions per week
POINTS
ST-34, ST-35, ST-36, Neixiyan, GB-33, GB-34, SP-9, SP-10, LR-7, LR-8, and distal points
🔬 Study Design
Electroacupuncture
n=28
Acupuncture with 2/100 Hz electrical stimulation
Manual acupuncture
n=30
Traditional acupuncture without electrical stimulation
📊 Results in numbers
TNF-α reduction (electroacupuncture)
IL-1β reduction (both groups)
MMP-3 reduction (both groups)
Pain improvement (VAS)
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
TNF-α reduction (pg/mL)
Functional improvement (WOMAC)
This study showed that both electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture can reduce inflammation and improve knee pain caused by osteoarthritis. Electroacupuncture had a slightly larger effect on inflammation reduction, but both techniques were effective and safe.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Knee osteoarthritis is one of the leading causes of disability in older adults, characterized by pain, stiffness, and functional limitation. Although traditionally viewed as a "degenerative" disease, growing evidence shows that inflammation plays a central role in the development and progression of osteoarthritis. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β promote cartilage destruction, while anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-13 may have protective effects. Acupuncture, including its electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture variations, has been studied as a nonpharmacologic alternative for the treatment of osteoarthritis, but its mechanisms of action remain poorly understood, especially with respect to anti-inflammatory effects.
This controlled clinical trial specifically investigated how electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture affect inflammatory markers in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The study randomized 58 participants aged 45–75 years with mild to moderate osteoarthritis to receive electroacupuncture or manual acupuncture for 8 weeks. The protocol included 24 sessions of 30 minutes each, using local points such as ST-34, ST-35, ST-36 and distal points. In the electroacupuncture group, 2/100 Hz electrical stimulation was applied at an intensity of 0.2 mA.
Blood samples were collected before and after treatment for analysis of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-18, IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17), chemokines (MCP-1, CCL5), and cartilage degradation biomarkers (MMP-1, MMP-3, MMP-13, COMP). The results showed that both treatments significantly reduced important pro-inflammatory cytokines: TNF-α decreased by 42% in the electroacupuncture group and 12% in the manual acupuncture group, while IL-1β was reduced in both groups. The cartilage degradation biomarkers MMP-3 and MMP-13 also decreased significantly in both groups. At the same time, there was an increase in the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-13.
Clinically, both treatments produced clinically significant improvements: pain (VAS scale) was reduced by 26.8 points in the electroacupuncture group and 25.4 points in the manual acupuncture group, exceeding the minimum clinically important difference threshold. Joint function (WOMAC scale) improved by 9.5 points in the electroacupuncture group and 8.3 points in the manual acupuncture group. Although electroacupuncture showed a significantly greater reduction in TNF-α compared with manual acupuncture, no statistically significant differences were observed between groups for other markers or clinical outcomes. Adverse events were minimal and self-limited, consisting mainly of mild pain at the needle site and small hematomas.
This study provides important evidence that the clinical benefits of acupuncture in knee osteoarthritis are partially mediated by specific anti-inflammatory effects. The reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β, together with the decrease in cartilage degradation markers, suggests that acupuncture may not only relieve symptoms but also influence underlying pathologic processes. Limitations include the relatively small sample size, absence of a placebo/control group, assessment of systemic markers only (not local synovial fluid), and follow-up limited to 8 weeks, which did not allow evaluation of long-term effects on structural progression of osteoarthritis.
Strengths
- 1Rigorous methodology with adequate randomization
- 2Comprehensive assessment of multiple inflammatory markers
- 3Well-standardized acupuncture protocols
- 4Validated clinical outcome measures (WOMAC, VAS)
Limitations
- 1Small sample size limiting statistical power
- 2Absence of a placebo/control group
- 3Systemic assessment only, not synovial fluid
- 4Short-term follow-up (8 weeks)
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
Knee osteoarthritis is one of the most frequent diagnoses in any pain and rehabilitation service, and the question that invariably arises is whether we are merely modulating symptoms or interfering with the pathologic substrate of the disease. This trial contributes directly to that discussion by demonstrating that both electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture reduce systemic markers of inflammation and cartilage degradation in patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis — the 45–75 age range that dominates musculoskeletal pain clinics. The 50% reduction in MMP-3 and MMP-13 has relevant practical implications: these metalloproteinases are key enzymes in articular collagen degradation, and their attenuation places acupuncture conceptually closer to disease-modifying therapies than to simple symptomatic analgesia. For the clinician integrating acupuncture into the multimodal management of osteoarthritis — alongside supervised exercise, pharmacologic analgesia, and physical therapy — this documented anti-inflammatory signaling reinforces the rationale for incorporating the technique earlier in the disease course.
▸ Notable Findings
The asymmetry between electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture in TNF-α reduction is striking: 42% versus 12%, respectively — a biologically meaningful difference that likely reflects the additional recruitment of neuroendocrine pathways by alternating-frequency 2/100 Hz electrical stimulation. This dense-disperse stimulation protocol is known to simultaneously release enkephalins and dynorphins, which may enhance suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines through descending pathways. In parallel, the increase in IL-13 in both groups introduces an immune-regulation component that goes beyond simple inflammatory suppression; IL-13 has chondro-inhibitory properties over IL-1β and may contribute to a less catabolic articular microenvironment. From a clinical standpoint, the 26.8-point VAS improvement in the electroacupuncture group comfortably exceeds the minimum clinically important difference, making the finding directly transferable to the conversation with the patient about realistic expectations of treatment response.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice at the musculoskeletal pain clinic, grade II–III knee osteoarthritis is the case that most frequently receives acupuncture as part of the multimodal plan, and the response pattern I have observed over the years converges substantially with what Shi et al. documented. I typically see perceptible pain reduction between the third and fifth sessions, with functional gain stabilizing around the eighth to tenth session. For patients with a more florid inflammatory phenotype — those with clinically evident synovitis, joint effusion, and prolonged morning stiffness — I prefer electroacupuncture with an alternating-frequency protocol, precisely because of the anti-inflammatory potency that this and other studies support. I routinely combine this with a quadriceps strengthening program and load-management guidance, since acupuncture alone rarely sustains functional gains. For maintenance, the pattern I adopt is biweekly sessions after the intensive phase. Patients with advanced osteoarthritis (grade IV with marked varus deformity) tend to respond less and should have expectations adjusted from the outset.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Journal of Pain Research · 2020
DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S256950
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories