Effects of acupuncture for the treatment of endometriosis-related pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Xu et al. · PLOS ONE · 2017

📊Systematic Review and Meta-analysis👥n=589 participantsHigh Clinical Impact

Evidence Level

MODERATE
75/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
3/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of endometriosis-related pain

👥

WHO

589 women of reproductive age with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis

⏱️

DURATION

Studies ranging from 8 weeks to 6 months

📍

POINTS

CV-3, CV-4, SP-6, BL-18, BL-20, LR-14, Zigong points, among others

🔬 Study Design

589participants
randomization

Acupuncture

n=295

Traditional acupuncture

Control

n=294

Western medicine, Chinese herbal therapy, or placebo

⏱️ Duration: 2 to 6 months

📊 Results in numbers

1.36 points

Pain reduction

5.9 U/mL

CA-125 reduction

2.07x higher

Clinical efficacy rate

< 0.0001

Pain p-value

📊 Outcome Comparison

Pain reduction (0-10 scale)

Acupuncture
4.8
Control
1.4
💬 What does this mean for you?

This review analyzed 10 studies with 589 women and showed that acupuncture may be effective in reducing pain caused by endometriosis. Treatment significantly reduced pain levels and inflammatory markers in the blood, offering a safe complementary option to conventional treatments.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent inflammatory gynecologic condition that affects 5-15% of women of reproductive age, causing severe chronic pelvic pain and infertility. Conventional treatments include hormonal therapies and surgery, but they frequently produce significant adverse effects and inadequate pain relief. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the efficacy of acupuncture as an alternative or complementary treatment for endometriosis-related pain. The investigators conducted a comprehensive search across six databases through December 2016, identifying randomized controlled trials that compared acupuncture with other treatments.

Ten studies with 589 participants were included, with 295 in the acupuncture group and 294 in the control groups. Study quality was assessed using Cochrane criteria. Most studies compared acupuncture with Western medicine (danazol, mifepristone, goserelin acetate) or traditional Chinese medicine, with only one study using an adequate placebo control. The most commonly used acupuncture points included CV-3, CV-4, CV-6, SP-6, BL-18, BL-20, and the extra Zigong points.

Results demonstrated that acupuncture was superior to controls in three primary outcomes. For pain reduction, measured on a 0-10 point scale, acupuncture showed a mean difference of 1.36 points favoring the experimental group (95% CI: 1.01-1.72, p<0.0001). In the only placebo-controlled study, the acupuncture group experienced a mean pain reduction of 4.8 points compared with 1.4 points in the control group (p=0.004). Regarding CA-125 levels, an inflammatory marker elevated in endometriosis, acupuncture significantly reduced serum levels by 5.9 U/mL compared with controls (95% CI: 1.56-10.25, p=0.008).

The clinical efficacy rate also favored acupuncture, with an odds ratio of 2.07 (95% CI: 1.24-3.44, p=0.005). Proposed mechanisms include activation of descending pain inhibitory systems, release of analgesic neurotransmitters, hormonal modulation with estradiol suppression, and improved immune function through increased natural killer (NK) cell activity. Despite these promising results, the review has important limitations: only one trial was adequately blinded, sample sizes were small (8-36 patients per arm), and methodologic heterogeneity was considerable. Three of the included studies were unpublished theses not subject to peer review.

Inadequate implementation of blinding and allocation concealment may have inflated the observed therapeutic effects. The clinical implications suggest that acupuncture may be a safe and well-tolerated adjunctive therapy for women with endometriosis-related pain, particularly when conventional treatments are inadequate or cause unacceptable adverse effects. The persistence of pain relief for up to 6 months after treatment, observed in the placebo-controlled study, is particularly encouraging. However, additional randomized, double-blind trials with adequate sample sizes and appropriate placebo controls are needed to definitively confirm these findings and establish standardized treatment protocols.

Strengths

  • 1Comprehensive search across multiple databases, including Chinese-language sources
  • 2Rigorous quality assessment using Cochrane criteria
  • 3Analysis of multiple clinically relevant outcomes
  • 4Inclusion limited to studies with laparoscopically confirmed diagnosis
  • 5Consistency of results across different control types
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Only one study with an adequate placebo control
  • 2Small sample sizes in most studies
  • 3Lack of adequate blinding in 9 of 10 studies
  • 4Three of the studies were unpublished theses
  • 5Methodologic heterogeneity across studies
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

Endometriosis affects 5 to 15% of women of reproductive age, and the chronic pelvic pain that accompanies it remains one of the most frustrating therapeutic challenges in gynecologic practice. Conventional options — danazol, GnRH analogs, mifepristone — carry adverse-effect profiles that frequently lead to treatment discontinuation or nonadherence, leaving a sizable subgroup of patients without adequate pain control. This meta-analysis of 589 women, requiring laparoscopic diagnostic confirmation as an inclusion criterion, positions acupuncture as a concrete adjunctive option in this setting. The 1.36-point reduction on the pain scale and the clinical efficacy rate 2.07 times higher than control translate into perceptible functional gains for patients with moderate to severe pain. The protocol using points CV-3, CV-4, CV-6, SP-6, BL-18, BL-20, and Zigong offers an immediately practical reference for integration with hormone therapy or as a therapeutic bridge before surgery.

Notable Findings

Two findings deserve particular attention. The first is the 5.9 U/mL reduction in serum CA-125 levels — a marker that reflects peritoneal inflammatory activity and active disease burden in endometriosis. Reductions in this marker under acupuncture suggest action beyond purely symptomatic pain modulation, pointing to systemic anti-inflammatory mechanisms, possibly mediated by increased NK cell activity and suppression of circulating estradiol. The second noteworthy finding comes from the only trial with an adequate placebo control: a 4.8-point reduction in the acupuncture group versus 1.4 points in the control group, with persistence of relief for up to six months after treatment ended. This durability of effect is clinically relevant in a chronic, relapsing condition, where maintaining pain control between hormonal cycles or after surgical procedures represents a real gain in quality of life.

From My Experience

In my practice with chronic pelvic pain of gynecologic origin, I have observed that acupuncture works best when introduced as part of a multimodal plan from the outset, rather than only after other options have been exhausted. For endometriosis, I typically see the first consistent responses between the third and fifth sessions — reduction in dysmenorrhea intensity and improvement in sleep, which is often the first sign that treatment is taking effect. On average, we work with cycles of 10 to 12 sessions for stabilization, followed by biweekly or monthly maintenance depending on the patient's hormonal cycle phase. I regularly combine acupuncture with myofascial pelvic trigger-point release techniques and, when medically indicated, maintain hormone therapy in parallel — the two approaches are not mutually exclusive. The patient profile that responds best, in my experience, is the young woman with moderate pain, without bulky ovarian disease, and willing to maintain regularity in sessions.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

PLOS ONE · 2017

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186616

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.