Acupuncture for clinical improvement of endometriosis‑related pain: a systematic review and meta‑analysis

Chen et al. · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2024

📊Meta-analysis of RCTs👥n=793 participantsHigh clinical impact

Evidence Level

MODERATE
75/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture in relieving endometriosis-related pain through a systematic review

👥

WHO

793 women with endometriosis and pelvic pain diagnosed by laparoscopy

⏱️

DURATION

Treatments from 5 weeks to 6 months with follow-up of up to 1 year

📍

POINTS

Zhongji (CV-3), Guanyuan (CV-4), Qihai (CV-6), Sanyinjiao (SP-6)

🔬 Study Design

793participants
randomization

Acupuncture Group

n=387

Body acupuncture, electroacupuncture, auricular therapy, warm needling, or fire needling

Control Group

n=359

Placebo, traditional Chinese medicine, or Western medicine

⏱️ Duration: 5 weeks to 6 months

📊 Results in numbers

SMD = -1.10

Reduction in pain intensity

RR = 1.25

Clinical response rate

SMD = -0.62

Reduction in serum CA-125

SMD = -1.81

Reduction in pelvic mass volume

SMD = -1.29

Improvement in quality of life (EHP-30)

Percentage highlights

RR = 1.25
Clinical response rate

📊 Outcome Comparison

Efficacy by acupuncture technique

Auricular therapy
85
Body acupuncture
75
Electroacupuncture
65
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study showed that acupuncture is effective at relieving pain caused by endometriosis, a condition where the tissue lining the uterus grows in other places. Acupuncture significantly reduced pain, improved quality of life, and lowered inflammatory markers, offering a safe alternative to conventional treatments.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Endometriosis is a chronic gynecologic condition characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity, affecting between 10-15% of women of reproductive age. This condition causes chronic inflammation, severe pelvic pain, and can lead to infertility, significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Conventional treatments include analgesics, anti-inflammatories, hormonal therapy, and surgery, but they often have limited efficacy and considerable side effects, with discontinuation rates of 25-50% due to adverse reactions such as bleeding, weight gain, and depression.

This study represents a comprehensive meta-analysis that evaluated 14 randomized clinical trials involving 793 patients to determine the efficacy of acupuncture in treating endometriosis-related pain. The researchers conducted a systematic search across eight international databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane, identifying studies that used acupuncture exclusively as an intervention, distinguishing it from previous reviews that included combination therapies.

The methodology included different acupuncture modalities: traditional body acupuncture, electroacupuncture, auricular therapy, warm needling, and fire needling. The most frequently used points were Zhongji (CV-3), Guanyuan (CV-4), and Qihai (CV-6) of the Ren meridian, and Sanyinjiao (SP-6) of the Spleen meridian. These points were selected for their anatomic location in the lower abdomen and their traditional therapeutic function in treating reproductive disorders and pain relief.

The results demonstrated significant efficacy of acupuncture across multiple outcomes. The primary analysis showed a substantial reduction in pain intensity (SMD = -1.10, 95% CI: -1.45 to -0.75, p<0.001), indicating a clinically relevant effect on pain control. The clinical response rate was higher in the acupuncture group (RR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.09-1.44, p=0.02), suggesting that more patients experienced clinically meaningful improvement. Additionally, a reduction was observed in serum CA-125 levels, an inflammatory marker associated with endometriosis (SMD = -0.62, 95% CI: -1.15 to -0.08, p=0.024).

Subgroup analyses revealed important differences among acupuncture modalities. Auricular therapy demonstrated the best results for pain reduction, followed by body acupuncture and electroacupuncture. For clinical response rate, auricular therapy and warm needling showed superiority, while electroacupuncture and fire needling did not show statistically significant differences compared to controls. These findings suggest that different techniques may have variable efficacy, guiding the selection of the most appropriate modality for each patient.

Proposed mechanisms for the effects of acupuncture include modulation of prostaglandins, β-endorphins, dynorphins, and substance P, all involved in pain perception and transmission. Acupuncture has also been shown to regulate endocrine function through modulation of estrogen receptors, influence the immune response by reducing inflammatory cytokines, and improve local blood circulation. Animal model studies have confirmed these mechanisms, showing normalization of electrolytes and reduction of inflammatory markers after acupuncture treatment.

The clinical implications are substantial, offering robust evidence for the use of acupuncture as an effective and safe treatment for endometriosis-related pain. Acupuncture presents significant advantages as an alternative or adjunct to conventional treatments, especially considering its favorable safety profile and absence of significant side effects. The results suggest that acupuncture may be considered first-line treatment for patients who do not tolerate or do not respond adequately to pharmacologic therapy.

Despite the promising results, the study has important limitations that should be considered in clinical interpretation. Most of the included studies were single-center with relatively small samples, and many did not adequately implement blinding and allocation concealment, potentially introducing bias. Heterogeneity among studies was considerable for some outcomes, reflecting differences in study populations, treatment protocols, and assessment criteria. In addition, long-term follow-up was limited, preventing conclusions about the durability of therapeutic effects.

Future studies should address these limitations through multicenter trials with larger samples, standardized protocols, and prolonged follow-up to confirm the sustained efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of endometriosis.

Strengths

  • 1Comprehensive search across 8 international databases
  • 2Exclusive inclusion of studies with acupuncture as monotherapy
  • 3Detailed subgroup analyses by type of technique and pain
  • 4Assessment of multiple clinically relevant outcomes
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Most studies were single-center with small samples
  • 2Inadequate implementation of blinding in most studies
  • 3Considerable heterogeneity among studies
  • 4Limited long-term follow-up
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

Endometriosis affects between 10% and 15% of women of reproductive age and represents one of the most frustrating scenarios in gynecologic practice precisely because of the limited therapeutic armamentarium: analgesics, anti-inflammatories, hormonal therapy, and surgery carry discontinuation rates of 25-50% due to adverse effects such as weight gain, bleeding, and depression. This meta-analysis of 14 randomized clinical trials with 793 patients provides the most solid foundation available to date for systematically including acupuncture in the care plan for these women. The findings apply directly to the patient who refuses or does not tolerate hormonal therapy, to one planning future pregnancy — in which prolonged hormonal suppression is undesirable — and to one awaiting surgery with poorly controlled pelvic pain. The concomitant reduction of CA-125 and pelvic mass volume broadens the conversation beyond symptomatic control, positioning acupuncture as an intervention with potential impact on the inflammatory substrate of the disease.

Notable Findings

The effect on pain intensity (SMD = -1.10) represents a clinically expressive magnitude, not merely statistical. Even more noteworthy is the finding regarding pelvic mass volume (SMD = -1.81), which suggests action beyond analgesia — possible modulation of the inflammatory microenvironment and local vascularization, a mechanism consistent with the preclinical data on cytokine regulation and estrogen receptors cited by the authors. The subgroup analysis reveals that auricular therapy and warm needling outperformed electroacupuncture and fire needling in clinical response rate, information that already guides technique selection in the office. The improvement in quality of life measured by the EHP-30 (SMD = -1.29), an instrument specific to endometriosis, validates that the gain is not limited to pain scales: there is real impact on daily functioning, sex life, and emotional well-being of these patients — dimensions frequently neglected by conventional pharmacologic protocols.

From My Experience

In my practice with patients with chronic pelvic pain due to endometriosis, I typically observe perceptible initial response between the third and fifth sessions — consistent with the five-week to six-month window of the studies included in this review. The protocol I usually employ is anchored in Guanyuan (CV-4), Qihai (CV-6), and Sanyinjiao (SP-6), exactly the points most frequently reported in this meta-analysis, often associating indirect moxibustion when there is an evident cold-stagnation pattern on traditional anamnesis. I almost always integrate pelvic physical therapy and, when the patient tolerates it, low-dose oral contraceptives as an adjunct in the more inflammatory cases. The profile that responds best, in my experience, is the young woman with predominantly cyclic pain and without extensive previous surgeries — greater adherence and less established central sensitization. The CA-125 decrease documented here aligns with what I have observed informally over the years: patients on regular acupuncture follow-up tend to present more stable inflammatory markers between gynecologic consultations, although we have rarely monitored this prospectively in the service.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2024

DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07675-z

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.