Skip to content

Evaluation of chronic head and neck myofascial pain control with Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture in eight weeks follow-up period

França Correia et al. · Rev Dor · 2015

📊Longitudinal Study👥n = 20Moderate Impact

Evidence Level

MODERATE
65/ 100
Quality
3/5
Sample
2/5
Replication
3/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture in the control of chronic head and neck myofascial pain

👥

WHO

20 women with chronic myofascial pain for more than 3 months (ages 23-46 years)

⏱️

DURATION

8 weeks with weekly 20-minute sessions

📍

POINTS

Cranial points A and B determined by the YNSA technique, based on assessment of the LI-4 (Hegu) point

🔬 Study Design

20participants
randomization

YNSA scalp acupuncture

n=20

0.25 x 30 mm needles in cranial points for 20 minutes, weekly sessions

⏱️ Duration: 8 weeks

📊 Results in numbers

from 7.9 to 0.8

Pain reduction

0%

Immediate relief

12/20

Pain-free patients

p < 0.05

Statistical significance

Percentage highlights

100%
Immediate relief

📊 Outcome Comparison

Pain intensity (0-10 scale)

Start of treatment
7.9
After 8 weeks
0.8
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study showed that Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture, a technique that uses needles in the scalp, was very effective in reducing chronic neck and head pain. All patients felt immediate pain relief after each session, and most became completely pain-free after 8 weeks of treatment.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This Brazilian study investigated the efficacy of Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture (YNSA) in the treatment of chronic head and neck myofascial pain. Myofascial pain is characterized by taut bands in the muscles with specific painful points, affecting muscles such as the masseter, temporalis, sternocleidomastoid, and trapezius. YNSA is a microsystem technique developed in 1973 that uses specific points on the skull to represent the entire human body. The research was conducted between July and October of 2013 and 2014 at the Brazilian Institute of Therapies and Teaching (IBRATE) in Curitiba.

Twenty female volunteers aged 23 to 46 years participated, all with complaints of pain for more than 3 months and the presence of taut myofascial bands diagnosed clinically. Exclusion criteria included patients receiving other pain treatments, with circulatory disorders, or using analgesic medications in the previous two weeks. The methodology involved 8 weekly sessions in which the LI-4 (Hegu) point on both hands was assessed to determine the more painful side, defining which side of the face would receive the acupuncture needles. 0.25 x 30 mm needles were inserted obliquely at points A and/or B of the YNSA technique and kept in place for 20 minutes.

Pain intensity was measured by the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (0-10) at the beginning of each session and after application. The results were impressive, showing significant pain reduction from an initial mean of 7.9 to 0.8 after 8 weeks (p < 0.05). All participants (100%) reported immediate pain relief after needle insertion when symptoms were present at the time of consultation. At the end of treatment, 12 volunteers became completely pain-free (intensity zero), 6 had intensity 1 with reduced frequency, one maintained fluctuation ending with intensity 5, and one ended with intensity 2.

The study demonstrated both immediate and lasting effects of the technique. The proposed mechanism of action includes the release of endogenous opioid peptides and activation of the descending inhibitory pain control system, in addition to Melzack's gate control theory. An important observation was the influence of emotional factors on the variability of analgesic results, highlighting the connection between psychological aspects and symptom intensity. The clinical implications are relevant, especially considering that YNSA offers immediate pain relief, which can motivate patients with chronic pain who are often discouraged by previous ineffective treatments.

The technique has the additional advantage of not being applied directly to the painful region. Limitations include the absence of a control group with sham or placebo therapy, which would have prevented blinding of participants. The sample size was also relatively small, and there was loss to follow-up of some participants. Despite these limitations, the results suggest that YNSA may be a valuable therapeutic option for patients with chronic head and neck myofascial pain, offering a minimally invasive, low-cost approach.

Strengths

  • 1Immediate pain relief in 100% of participants
  • 2Significant pain reduction sustained over 8 weeks
  • 3Minimally invasive technique applied away from the painful area
  • 4Statistically significant results
  • 5Low-cost method
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Absence of a placebo control group
  • 2Small sample (n = 20)
  • 3Loss to follow-up of some participants
  • 4Unblinded study
  • 5Lack of long-term follow-up assessment
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

Chronic head and neck myofascial pain represents one of the most prevalent and frustrating conditions in the pain clinic, with patients who often accumulate a history of partially effective treatments and high functional burden. Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture (YNSA) fits into this context as a technically distinct alternative: the insertion points are on the scalp, entirely away from the painful region, which makes it especially useful when intense local hyperalgesia precludes direct needling of the masseter, temporalis, sternocleidomastoid, or trapezius. The reduction in pain scores from 7.9 to 0.8 across eight weekly sessions, sustained with statistical significance, signals that the effect is not ephemeral. Populations with refractory chronic pain, patients who refuse direct cervical or craniofacial needling, and cases with a strong central sensitization component are natural candidates to benefit from this approach.

Notable Findings

The most striking finding is not the magnitude of the final reduction—expressive but expected in open-label studies—but rather the fact that 100% of participants with active pain at the time of consultation reported immediate relief after needle insertion at the cranial points. This very short response latency is uncommon even among microsystem techniques and raises clinically relevant questions about the underlying neurophysiological substrate. At the end of the eight weeks, 12 of the 20 participants reached intensity zero—corresponding to 60% complete remission—while most of the remaining participants reported intensity 1. The authors' own observation regarding the influence of emotional factors on session-to-session analgesic variability deserves attention: it resonates with what pain neuroscience has consolidated about descending modulation and suggests that screening emotional state before each session may be clinically informative.

From My Experience

In my practice with cervico-craniofacial myofascial pain, YNSA occupies a specific niche that I have come to value over the years: the patient with marked allodynia in the cervical region, in whom direct needling of trigger points provokes a vasovagal reaction or unacceptable temporary exacerbation. In these cases, working exclusively on the scalp—away from the painful field—allows treatment to begin without provoking defensive reaction. I usually observe measurable response within the first two or three sessions, and the pattern of 60% complete remission at the end of eight weeks is consistent with what I see in my clinic, although in cases with intense emotional component the trajectory is more fluctuating, exactly as the authors recorded. I routinely combine YNSA with postural hygiene guidance and, when the clinical picture allows, with cervical stabilization exercises—the combination tends to sustain gains beyond the active treatment period. Patients with untreated anxiety disorder respond irregularly; in this profile, I prefer to ensure concurrent psychiatric support before attributing variability to the technique itself.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Rev Dor · 2015

DOI: 10.5935/1806-0013.20150016

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.