Neuroimaging Studies of Acupuncture on Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review

Wen et al. · Frontiers in Neuroscience · 2021

📊Systematic Review👥n = 633 participants🧠High Impact - Neuroimaging

Evidence Level

MODERATE
75/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
3/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

Investigate study design and main neuroimaging findings on acupuncture for low back pain

👥

WHO

613 patients with low back pain from 19 studies between 2007 and 2020

⏱️

DURATION

Analysis of studies with 3 minutes to 8 weeks of treatment

📍

POINTS

Ashi points, GB-23, GB-40, GB-25 were the most used

🔬 Study Design

633participants
randomization

Patients with low back pain

n=613

Manual acupuncture or electroacupuncture

Healthy controls

n=120

Control group

⏱️ Duration: 3 minutes to 8 weeks

📊 Results in numbers

0%

Studies using manual acupuncture

0%

Studies assessing functional changes

0%

Studies using resting-state fMRI

0%

Studies conducted in China

Percentage highlights

78.9%
Studies using manual acupuncture
89.5%
Studies assessing functional changes
68.4%
Studies using resting-state fMRI
73.7%
Studies conducted in China

📊 Outcome Comparison

Acupuncture modality used

Manual acupuncture
79
Electroacupuncture
21
💬 What does this mean for you?

This review analyzed how acupuncture affects the brain of people with low back pain, using neuroimaging studies. The results show that acupuncture modifies brain activity in areas related to pain, especially in the prefrontal cortex, insula, and cerebellum, which may explain how it relieves pain.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Acupuncture, a millennia-old practice from traditional Chinese medicine, has been widely used in the treatment of chronic low back pain. This condition affects approximately 40% of people during their lifetime and is considered one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Although several studies confirm the efficacy of acupuncture for low back pain relief, the neurologic mechanisms by which it acts on the brain had not been fully clarified. For this reason, researchers have been using advanced neuroimaging techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging, to investigate how acupuncture modifies brain activity in patients with low back pain.

This study represents a comprehensive systematic review that analyzed 19 studies published between 2007 and 2020, involving 613 patients with low back pain and 120 healthy individuals as a control group. The researchers conducted searches in seven scientific databases, including studies in both English and Chinese, to ensure a complete view of the available literature on the topic. The methodology included a rigorous analysis of study quality and extraction of data on participant characteristics, types of acupuncture intervention, and neuroimaging results.

The results revealed interesting patterns about how acupuncture is studied in clinical practice. The vast majority of studies (78.9%) used manual acupuncture, while the rest used electroacupuncture. About 89.5% of the research focused on functional brain changes caused by acupuncture, and 68.4% used resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. The study identified that patients with low back pain show specific alterations in important brain regions, including the prefrontal cortex, insula, cerebellum, primary somatosensory cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex.

These areas are closely related to processing of pain, emotion, and cognition.

The most significant findings showed that acupuncture produces brain changes in regions fundamental to pain control. The prefrontal cortex and insula were the areas most frequently modified by treatment, followed by the cerebellum, primary somatosensory cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex. These regions are part of the so-called 'pain matrix,' a neural network responsible for processing painful sensations. In addition, acupuncture also influenced other important neural networks, including the default mode network (related to the brain's resting state), the salience network (which processes relevant information), and the descending pain modulation system (which controls the intensity of perceived pain).

Some studies demonstrated significant correlations between clinical improvements of patients and the changes observed on brain imaging, suggesting that the neurologic changes are directly related to pain relief.

For patients and health care professionals, these findings offer robust scientific evidence on how acupuncture works in the treatment of low back pain. The study demonstrates that acupuncture not only relieves symptoms superficially but actually modifies the activity of brain circuits fundamental to pain processing. This may help explain why many patients experience lasting relief with acupuncture treatment. For professionals, this information can guide the selection of acupuncture points and more effective treatment strategies.

The research also suggests that both manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture are capable of producing beneficial brain alterations, although they may act through slightly different mechanisms.

Despite the promising findings, the study has some important limitations that must be considered. The main limitation was the great variability in the methodologies used by the different analyzed studies, including different types of acupuncture, points of application, treatment duration, and neuroimaging techniques employed. This heterogeneity made it impossible to perform a quantitative meta-analysis of the results, limiting the ability to draw definitive conclusions. In addition, many studies included relatively small samples of patients, and some presented risks of methodologic bias.

Most research focused only on functional effects on the brain, with few studies investigating long-term structural changes. The authors also noted that almost all research used only magnetic resonance imaging, suggesting that future studies could benefit from the combination of multiple neuroimaging techniques for a more complete understanding of the mechanisms of action of acupuncture. Despite these limitations, the review provides valuable evidence that acupuncture promotes beneficial changes in the brain of patients with low back pain, offering a solid scientific basis for its clinical use and directing future research in the area.

Strengths

  • 1First comprehensive systematic review on neuroimaging of acupuncture for low back pain
  • 2Detailed analysis of methodologies and brain findings
  • 3Identification of specific neural networks involved in pain relief
  • 4Broad temporal coverage (2007–2020)
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Large heterogeneity in study designs
  • 2Small sample sizes in most studies
  • 3Lack of standardization in acupuncture protocols
  • 4Limited to magnetic resonance imaging neuroimaging studies
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

Chronic low back pain remains one of the most challenging problems in physiatry and pain medicine, not only because of its prevalence — estimates that approximately 40% of the population will be affected at some point in life confirm what any rehabilitation service experiences daily — but because of the difficulty in mechanistically explaining why certain interventions work. This systematic review by Wen et al. offers the clinician a coherent synthesis of how acupuncture alters central neural circuits in low back pain patients: prefrontal cortex, insula, cerebellum, primary somatosensory cortex, and anterior cingulate are consistently modulated. For those who make therapeutic decisions in patients with central sensitization, refractory chronic pain, or contraindications to opioids, having neuroimaging correlates that support the intervention transforms the conversation with the patient and with the multidisciplinary team. The evidence that both manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture produce these alterations broadens the technical options available to the physician.

Notable Findings

The finding that most deserves clinical attention is the consistent modulation of the default mode network, salience network, and descending inhibitory pain control system — three systems with a central role in chronicity and pain catastrophizing. Acupuncture does not act only peripherally: it reorganizes resting-state functional connectivity networks, which explains why patients with chronic low back pain, whose problem frequently transcends local musculoskeletal tissue, report benefits that exceed what would be expected from a localized intervention. The fact that 68.4% of studies used resting-state fMRI — not just during stimulation — is particularly relevant: it means that brain changes persist beyond the moment of needle application. The correlation between clinical improvement and changes in brain imaging, demonstrated in some of the included studies, offers the kind of neurophysiologic validation that strengthens acupuncture as a first-line intervention in chronic pain.

From My Experience

In my practice in the musculoskeletal pain clinic, I have observed that patients with chronic low back pain of central component — those with diffuse allodynia, disturbed sleep patterns, and high catastrophizing scores — respond differently from patients with predominantly mechanical nociceptive pain. The findings of this review help organize this clinical impression: modulation of the insula and anterior cingulate, structures involved in the affective-motivational dimension of pain, explains why some patients report improvement in mood and sleep quality even before noticing a significant reduction in pain score. I typically see clinically perceptible response between the third and fifth session of manual acupuncture in chronic low back pain patients, with stabilization of gains around the tenth to twelfth session. I routinely associate acupuncture with a supervised exercise program and, when there is a relevant myofascial component, with dry needling of paravertebral trigger points — a combination that, in my experience, enhances and prolongs the benefit. The patient profile that responds best is one with pain for more than six months, already refractory to NSAIDs and conventional physical therapy alone.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Frontiers in Neuroscience · 2021

DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.730322

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.