Acupuncture for radicular pain: a review of analgesic mechanism
Li et al. · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · 2024
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
To review the mechanisms by which acupuncture relieves radicular pain
WHO
Patients with lumbar radicular pain, cervical radicular pain, and spinal stenosis
DURATION
Review of studies published through 2024
POINTS
Jiaji points, Feiyang (BL-58), Houxi (SI-3), Huantiao (GB-30)
🔬 Study Design
Literature Review
n=0
Analysis of multiple studies on acupuncture for radicular pain
📊 Results in numbers
Reduction in inflammatory cytokines
Improved microcirculation
Modulation of synaptic plasticity
Changes in default neural network
📊 Outcome Comparison
Identified Mechanisms of Action
This review shows that acupuncture relieves radicular pain (pain that radiates down the arm or leg) through several mechanisms: it relaxes muscles, reduces inflammation, improves blood circulation, and modulates brain activity. Studies demonstrate that acupuncture is effective and safe for different types of radicular pain.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Radicular pain represents one of the most challenging types of neuropathic pain in medical practice, characterized by intense pain, numbness, and tingling that radiate along specific nerve pathways. This condition can result from disc herniation, spinal stenosis, or vertebral degeneration, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. Despite advances in modern medicine, the treatment of radicular pain remains complex, with important limitations in both surgical and pharmacologic approaches. In this context, acupuncture emerges as a promising therapeutic alternative, grounded in thousands of years of clinical practice in traditional Chinese medicine.
The main objective of this review was to examine and synthesize the current scientific knowledge on the mechanisms by which acupuncture produces pain relief in patients with radicular pain. The researchers conducted a comprehensive analysis of the scientific literature, including clinical and experimental studies that investigated the effects of acupuncture on different types of radicular pain, including lumbar radiculopathy, cervical radiculopathy, and radicular pain related to spinal stenosis. The methodology involved critical review of research that used both manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture, analyzing everything from studies in animal models to clinical trials in humans.
The results revealed that acupuncture acts through multiple biological mechanisms to promote relief of radicular pain. At the peripheral level, acupuncture demonstrated the ability to reduce muscle spasms and decrease mechanical pressure on nerve roots while simultaneously improving local microcirculation. This effect is particularly relevant because nerve root compression is one of the main causes of radicular pain. In addition, acupuncture has been shown to reduce local edema and improve oxygen delivery to tissues, contributing to the reduction of nerve compression symptoms.
At the molecular level, the research identified that acupuncture modulates important inflammatory signaling pathways, specifically inhibiting the HMGB1/RAGE and TLR4/NF-κB pathways. These pathways are crucial in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α, which contribute significantly to peripheral sensitization and the perpetuation of pain. The ability of acupuncture to reduce the release of these inflammatory substances represents a fundamental mechanism for its analgesic effects.
In the central nervous system, the findings demonstrated that acupuncture influences synaptic plasticity in the spinal cord, modulating important synaptic proteins such as PSD-95 and GAP-43, as well as affecting neurotrophic factors such as BDNF. This modulation of synaptic plasticity is essential for interrupting the cycles of central sensitization that maintain chronic pain. Functional neuroimaging studies revealed that acupuncture also acts on specific brain regions involved in pain processing, including the medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and thalamus, components of the brain's default mode network. These findings provide solid neurobiological evidence for the analgesic effects of acupuncture, demonstrating that its benefits extend from the periphery to the higher centers of pain processing.
The clinical implications of these findings are substantial for both patients and health care professionals. For patients suffering from radicular pain, acupuncture offers a safe and effective therapeutic option, with a low incidence of adverse effects compared with conventional medications or surgical interventions. Research has demonstrated that acupuncture can provide significant pain relief, particularly when integrated into multidisciplinary approaches that include physical therapy and other conservative modalities. For health care professionals, these results provide a robust scientific basis for incorporating acupuncture into treatment protocols for radicular pain, especially considering that many patients prefer to avoid analgesic medications because of side effects or have contraindications to surgery.
It is important to acknowledge the limitations of this review and the considerations that should guide future research. Although the studies demonstrate significant correlations between acupuncture treatment and symptom improvement, establishing definitive causal relationships remains challenging because of the complex, multifactorial nature of the pain experience. Standardization of acupuncture protocols remains an obstacle, given that point selection, insertion depth, and treatment duration can vary significantly among practitioners and patients. In addition, many studies presented relatively small sample sizes, limiting the generalizability of results.
The need for larger randomized controlled trials, with more diverse populations and objective measures of pain and function, remains critical to advancing our understanding of the mechanisms of acupuncture.
Acupuncture represents a valuable therapeutic modality for the management of radicular pain, acting through well-defined biological mechanisms that span from modulation of peripheral inflammation to changes in brain function. Although more research is needed to fully elucidate all aspects of its analgesic action, current evidence supports its integration into comprehensive treatment strategies for radicular pain, offering hope for patients seeking safe and effective alternatives to conventional treatments.
Strengths
- 1Comprehensive analysis of multiple mechanisms of action
- 2Integration of evidence from molecular to brain level
- 3Review of different types of radicular pain
- 4Solid scientific basis with experimental and clinical studies
Limitations
- 1Need for more randomized controlled trials
- 2Relatively small sample sizes in the studies
- 3Lack of standardization in acupuncture protocols
- 4Need for long-term longitudinal studies
Expert Commentary
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai
PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo
▸ Clinical Relevance
Radicular pain — whether of lumbar, cervical, or spinal canal stenosis origin — constitutes one of the most refractory presentations in the pain clinic, precisely because the pathophysiology simultaneously involves mechanical compression, perineural inflammation, and central sensitization. This review is clinically valuable because it maps these three targets and demonstrates that acupuncture addresses them simultaneously, something no single drug can do with the same safety profile. In practice, this translates into a concrete indication for patients awaiting surgery who need symptomatic control in the preoperative period, for those who refuse or have contraindications to anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids, and for cases of prior surgery without complete resolution of pain. The integration with physical therapy and neuromotor rehabilitation gains a solid mechanistic foundation in this work, reinforcing the rationale for the multimodal treatment we already practice.
▸ Notable Findings
The most robust aspect of this review is the demonstration that acupuncture specifically inhibits the HMGB1/RAGE and TLR4/NF-κB pathways, reducing the production of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in the perineural microenvironment. These cytokines not only sensitize the peripheral nociceptor but also feed back into the cycle of edema and radicular compression — breaking this cycle has direct clinical impact. Equally notable is the modulation of PSD-95, GAP-43, and BDNF in the spinal cord, proteins directly related to the maintenance of central sensitization: this explains why patients with chronic radiculopathy, in whom the peripheral source has already been treated, continue to benefit from acupuncture. Functional neuroimaging data showing changes in the medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, and thalamus complete the picture, connecting molecular mechanisms to patient-perceived outcomes.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center, I typically see the first signs of response in acute lumbar radiculopathy after the third or fourth session — reduction in radiation and improvement in sleep are the earliest markers patients report. For subacute cases, I usually work with cycles of ten to twelve sessions before reassessing the plan. I have systematically combined electroacupuncture at segmental points corresponding to the affected radicular level with distal points on the affected meridian, a combination that seems to potentiate precisely the local anti-inflammatory modulation described in this review. The patient profile that responds best, in my observation over the decades, is one with up to six months of evolution, pain that is predominantly nociceptive-inflammatory even with a neuropathic component, and no established motor deficit. When there is progressive motor deficit or cauda equina syndrome, acupuncture remains as an adjuvant after decompression, never as a substitute for urgent surgery.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · 2024
DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2024.1332876
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories