Effects and mechanisms of acupuncture analgesia mediated by afferent nerves in acupoint microenvironments

Fan et al. · Frontiers in Neuroscience · 2024

📚Systematic Review🔬n=91 studies analyzedHigh Scientific Impact

Evidence Level

STRONG
85/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
5/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To analyze how nerve fibers at acupuncture points mediate the analgesic effects of acupuncture

👥

WHO

Analysis of 91 basic studies on afferent fibers and acupuncture analgesia

⏱️

DURATION

Review of studies from 2003 to 2023

📍

POINTS

ST-36, PC-6, GB-30, BL-40, SP-6, GB-34, and other widely studied points

🔬 Study Design

91participants
randomization

Electroacupuncture studies

n=45

EA at different frequencies and intensities

Manual acupuncture studies

n=28

MA with traditional stimulation

Combined studies

n=18

Comparison between EA and MA

⏱️ Duration: 20 years of research (2003-2023)

📊 Results in numbers

Effective analgesia

A-fiber activation in the muscle layer

Required for analgesia

C-fiber activation in the cutaneous layer

EA activates A fibers; MA activates A and C

EA vs MA

Same segment: A fibers sufficient

Segmental specificity

📊 Outcome Comparison

Fiber type activated by modality

Electroacupuncture
70
Manual acupuncture
95
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study reveals how acupuncture works to relieve pain: it activates different types of nerve fibers at acupuncture points, which then send signals to the spinal cord and brain to block pain transmission. Depending on the depth and intensity of stimulation, different nerve fibers are activated, explaining why specific techniques work better for different types of pain.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Chronic pain is one of the most prevalent medical conditions worldwide and affects millions of people, significantly limiting their quality of life. Although effective pharmacological treatments exist, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids, they frequently cause serious side effects, including dependence, gastrointestinal problems, and overdose risk. In this context, acupuncture has been consolidated as a promising therapeutic alternative, offering pain relief without the risks associated with conventional medications. The World Health Organization has expanded the list of diseases that acupuncture can treat to 91 conditions, including multiple types of pain.

The analgesic effect of acupuncture has been extensively documented in randomized clinical trials for various conditions, ranging from cancer pain to rheumatoid arthritis and migraine.

This study aimed to analyze the patterns and mechanisms of acupuncture-induced analgesia, with specific focus on the role of afferent nerve fibers present in the acupoint microenvironment. The researchers conducted a systematic narrative review, using the PubMed and Web of Science databases to identify studies published between 2003 and 2023. The search included terms related to acupuncture, nerve fibers, and pain, initially yielding 715 articles. After careful selection following rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria, 91 basic studies that specifically investigated acupuncture's effects on afferent fibers and analgesia were analyzed.

The methodology included detailed analysis of studies that employed different acupuncture modalities, including manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture, and transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation, across various experimental pain models.

The results revealed a complex mechanism by which acupuncture produces analgesia through activation of different types of afferent nerve fibers. The study identified that acupuncture points have a high density of primary afferent nerve fibers, including medium-diameter myelinated A fibers and unmyelinated C fibers. The research demonstrated that when acupuncture is applied at the muscle layer, analgesic effects can be induced by stimulation at the threshold intensity of A fibers. However, when applied to the cutaneous layer, analgesic effects can only be produced by stimulation at the threshold intensity of C fibers.

This finding suggests that the depth and location of stimulation are crucial factors for treatment efficacy. Electroacupuncture was shown to mainly activate A fibers, whereas manual acupuncture activates both A and C fibers, explaining the different sensations and clinical efficacies observed.

The central mechanisms of analgesia revealed that acupuncture fundamentally modifies how the nervous system processes pain signals. At the spinal cord level, acupuncture activates neurons through depolarization of afferent fibers, modulating the "pain gate" as described in the gate control theory. This theory explains that A fibers, when activated, can "close the gate" and inhibit the transmission of painful signals by C fibers. In addition, acupuncture has been shown to inhibit long-term potentiation in the spinal dorsal horn and reduce the activity of wide dynamic range neurons, which are crucial in pain information transmission.

In higher nervous centers, acupuncture inhibits neuronal activation in brain regions related to pain, creating a systemic analgesic effect that extends beyond the application site.

For patients and healthcare providers, these findings have significant clinical implications that may optimize the therapeutic use of acupuncture. The research provides evidence-based guidance for the appropriate selection of acupuncture techniques. For example, for superficial skin pain, higher stimulation intensities that activate C fibers may be required, while for deeper muscular pain, lower intensities that activate A fibers may be sufficient. The study also reveals that segmental specificity exists between pain areas and acupuncture points, where points located in the same nerve segment as the lesion require lower stimulation intensity to produce effective analgesia.

For providers, this means that treatment can be personalized based on the anatomy and specific location of the patient's pain, potentially improving therapeutic outcomes and reducing the treatment time required.

Despite the promising findings, the study has some important limitations that must be considered. The research was predominantly based on studies using animal models, and the translation of these mechanisms to humans may not be direct due to physiological and anatomical differences between species. Additionally, most of the analyzed studies focused on specific models of acute or inflammatory pain, which may not adequately represent the complex chronic pain conditions encountered in clinical practice. The study also acknowledges that gaps remain in understanding how different types of acupuncture points can activate specific subtypes of afferent nerve fibers.

The authors suggest that future research should explore advanced technologies such as single-cell RNA sequencing to better analyze primary sensory neuron subtypes and their receptor mechanisms in the dorsal root ganglion. This research establishes a solid scientific foundation for the use of acupuncture in pain management, providing valuable insights into how to optimize treatment protocols and develop more precise clinical guidelines for different painful conditions.

Strengths

  • 1Comprehensive analysis of 91 high-quality studies
  • 2Identification of specific patterns of nerve fiber activation
  • 3Evidence-based guidelines proposed for clinical application
  • 4Integration of knowledge across different acupuncture modalities
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Mainly studies in animal models
  • 2Variability in stimulation protocols across studies
  • 3Need for more clinical research for validation
  • 4Complexity of translating findings into clinical practice
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

Understanding the neural mechanisms underlying acupuncture analgesia has moved beyond academic curiosity to become a practical guide for therapeutic decision-making. This review of 91 studies, spanning two decades of research, consolidates something experienced clinicians already intuited empirically: depth of insertion and stimulation intensity are not interchangeable variables, but direct determinants of the profile of fibers activated and, therefore, of the type of analgesia obtained. For the acupuncture physician, this means that a patient with deep lumbar myalgia responds to different parameters than a patient with cutaneous allodynia from peripheral neuropathy. The documented segmental specificity — points in the same dermatome requiring lower intensity for analgesic effect — reinforces the anatomical rationale for selecting local and segmental acupuncture points, integrating classical medicine with the modern neurophysiological framework.

Notable Findings

The most relevant finding of this analysis is the functional dissociation between the muscle layer and the cutaneous layer at acupuncture points. In musculature, threshold activation of Aδ fibers alone is sufficient to produce effective analgesia; in the skin, only activation of C fibers — obtained with considerably higher stimulation intensities — generates the same effect. This distinction explains, on solid neurophysiological grounds, why electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture produce distinct analgesic patterns: EA predominantly recruits myelinated Aδ fibers, while manual acupuncture, by generating the De Qi (得气) sensation complex, co-activates Aδ and C fibers. Another noteworthy finding is the modulation of long-term potentiation in the dorsal horn, a central mechanism in pain chronification — positioning acupuncture not only as a symptomatic analgesic, but as a potentially disease-modifying intervention in the central sensitization process.

From My Experience

At the Pain Center of HC-FMUSP, these findings echo patterns we have observed for decades in selecting electroacupuncture parameters. For myofascial syndromes with trigger points in deep musculature — trapezius, gluteus medius, iliopsoas — I usually obtain satisfactory response within the first three to four sessions with low-frequency EA at Aδ threshold intensity, without needing to push the patient into the discomfort of C-fiber activation. By contrast, in patients with marked cutaneous allodynia, such as in postherpetic neuropathies, the strategy must be completely different: perilesional manual acupuncture with progressive intensity, respecting the local hyperexcitability. On average, I work with cycles of eight to twelve sessions for subacute musculoskeletal conditions, reserving longer protocols for chronic pain with a central component. The profile that responds best to low-intensity muscular EA is the patient with well-localized nociceptive pain without a predominant neuropathic component — exactly what the biology of Aδ fibers predicts.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Frontiers in Neuroscience · 2024

DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1239839

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.