Development of Provisional Acupuncture Guidelines for Pelvic Pain in Endometriosis Using an e-Delphi Consensus Process

Giese et al. · Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine · 2023

🎯e-Delphi Study + Literature Review👥n=20 international expertsHigh clinical impact

Evidence Level

MODERATE
75/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
3/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

Develop practical acupuncture guidelines for pelvic pain in endometriosis through expert consensus

👥

WHO

20 international acupuncturists with at least 5 years of experience in endometriosis

⏱️

DURATION

Study conducted between June and September 2020

📍

POINTS

31 recommended points including CV-3, CV-4, CV-6, ST-25, SP-4, SP-6, LR-3, ST-36

🔬 Study Design

20participants
randomization

e-Delphi Experts

n=20

Consensus on acupuncture protocols

Literature Review

n=29

Analysis of published studies

⏱️ Duration: 3 consensus rounds over 4 months

📊 Results in numbers

94 statements

Consensus reached for use

29 statements

Consensus against use

55 statements

No consensus

0%

Participant retention rate

31 points

Recommended acupuncture points

Percentage highlights

100%
Participant retention rate

📊 Outcome Comparison

Level of Consensus by Round

Round 2
92
Round 3
31
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study created practical guidelines for treating pelvic pain caused by endometriosis using acupuncture. Twenty international experts agreed on the best treatment methods, including which points to use and how to deliver sessions, offering standardized guidance for clinicians.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Endometriosis is a condition that affects approximately 10% of women in Western countries, characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterus. Pelvic pain is the most frequently reported symptom, causing significant annual costs and substantial impact on patients' quality of life and mental health. Although conventional treatments such as hormonal therapies, analgesics, and surgery are available, their limitations include significant side effects and symptom recurrence, suggesting the need for additional therapeutic options.

Growing evidence supports the use of acupuncture as an effective intervention to reduce pain in women with endometriosis. However, the treatments used in research vary considerably, and it remains unclear which specific protocol could be recommended for clinical practice. This research project aimed to clarify how acupuncture could be used in the treatment of this condition.

The study comprised two main phases: a systematized literature review to extract details of acupuncture treatments from published research, and an e-Delphi study to obtain knowledge about details used by expert acupuncturists. The literature review examined 29 unique studies and found a wide range of treatment details with little agreement between studies. Many studies did not provide sufficient information about important treatment aspects, such as the style of acupuncture used, number of needle insertions, or whether needles were inserted unilaterally or bilaterally.

The e-Delphi study involved 20 international acupuncturists with a minimum of 5 years of experience treating endometriosis-related pelvic pain. The process was conducted over three rounds, with the first round collecting qualitative data and subsequent rounds building group consensus. Consensus was defined as a rating of at least 5 on a 7-point Likert scale by at least 70% of experts.

Results showed that experts reached consensus on 94 statements for recommended use, disagreed on 29 statements, and could not reach consensus on 55 statements. The provisional guidelines developed include recommendations to use TCM (Traditional Chinese Medicine) style acupuncture, Master Tung style, and electroacupuncture, applied in at least a partially individualized manner. Thirty-one acupuncture points are provisionally recommended, including CV-3, CV-4, CV-6, ST-25, ST-28, ST-29, ST-30, SP-4, SP-6, SP-8, SP-10, KI-3, LR-3, ST-36, among others.

The recommended protocol includes a needle retention time of approximately 30 minutes using disposable medical-grade stainless steel needles, with diameter and length depending on the patient's body and anatomy. The recommended treatment frequency is one to two times per week for a minimum of 2-3 months, continuing until pain relief. Important additional components include the use of Chinese herbal medicine, moxibustion, and dietary guidance, which were identified as critical factors for effectiveness.

The study highlighted the importance of treatment individualization and the application of a whole-systems approach. Experts agreed that blood stasis is always a branch of the condition, and practitioners need to also treat the underlying root, following the TCM root-and-branch theory. In addition, it is recommended to combine local and distal points, provide treatment throughout the menstrual cycle, evolve it appropriately, and adapt it to comorbidities such as infertility.

The main limitations of the study include its reliance on expert opinion, which is at the bottom of the evidence hierarchy, and the inherent variability that may arise from differences in participants' backgrounds. However, these limitations were mitigated by the international diversity of participants and their high level of expertise, with full retention of participants throughout the three rounds.

This work represents a significant initial attempt to fill the gap in guidance for clinicians in this area. The provisional guidelines offered provide a structured framework for treating endometriosis-related pelvic pain using acupuncture, based on the consensus of experienced international experts. The authors emphasize that these are provisional guidelines that await validation through future studies on the effectiveness of these specific protocols.

Strengths

  • 1First study to develop specific acupuncture guidelines for endometriosis
  • 2Rigorous methodology following CREDES standards
  • 3Diverse international panel of 20 experienced experts
  • 4100% participant retention rate
  • 5Comprehensive approach including literature review and expert consensus
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Based solely on expert opinion, not on experimental evidence
  • 2Inability to fully synthesize due to lack of data in the literature
  • 355 important statements did not reach consensus
  • 4Provisional guidelines awaiting validation through effectiveness studies
  • 5Limited to English- and German-language literature only
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

Endometriosis affects about 10% of women of reproductive age in Western countries, and chronic pelvic pain remains refractory to conventional approaches in a sizable proportion of these patients. Hormonal therapy and surgery have established efficacy, yet they carry meaningful adverse effects and significant recurrence rates, opening concrete space for the integration of acupuncture into the treatment plan. The value of this work lies in offering, for the first time, a structured set of recommendations based on consensus among 20 international experts. Physicians caring for women with endometriosis now have a reference framework that guides the choice of styles — classical TCM, Master Tung, and electroacupuncture — point selection, weekly frequency, and a minimum treatment duration of 2 to 3 months, plus adjunctive components such as moxibustion, Chinese herbal medicine, and dietary counseling, all integrated into routine gynecologic care.

Notable Findings

The three-round e-Delphi process produced positive consensus on 94 statements, with 100% expert retention across the four months — a figure that reflects methodological robustness and genuine panel engagement. Among the most relevant findings is convergence around 31 provisionally recommended points, with emphasis on CV-3, CV-4, CV-6, SP-6, SP-8, LR-3, and ST-36, organized around the principle of combining local with distal points. The conceptual premise that blood stasis is a universal component of the condition — with treatment needing to address both root and branch in line with classical theory — gave clinical coherence to the protocol. The recommendation for partial treatment individualization, combined with maintenance throughout the menstrual cycle, is another clinically relevant finding that distinguishes this protocol from the standardized approaches used in earlier studies.

From My Experience

In my practice with the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center, patients with endometriosis typically arrive after years of hormonal treatment and, not uncommonly, after one or more surgeries. I have observed an initial response to acupuncture — particularly a reduction in dysmenorrhea intensity — within the first 3 to 4 sessions, but stabilization of the pain pattern across the cycle usually requires 10 to 16 sessions. The protocol I most often use closely matches this consensus: SP-6, SP-8, LR-3, CV-4, and ST-36 as the backbone of treatment, with electroacupuncture at lumbosacral points in cases with a prominent neuropathic component. I systematically combine this with physical activity counseling and, when feasible, moxibustion at CV-4 for patients with a predominantly cold-deficiency pattern. The profile that responds best, in my experience, is the patient with predominantly cyclic pain and lower-grade established central sensitization — precisely those in whom treatment individualization across the cycle, as the consensus advocates, makes a tangible difference in functional outcomes.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine · 2023

DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2022.0659

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.