Auricular Acupuncture for Dental Anxiety: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Karst et al. · Anesthesia & Analgesia · 2007
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
Compare auricular acupuncture with intranasal midazolam for reducing anxiety during dental extraction
WHO
67 adult patients (18-65 years) scheduled for dental extraction
DURATION
25-minute intervention before the dental procedure
POINTS
Relaxation, tranquilizer, and master cerebral points on the non-dominant ear
🔬 Study Design
Auricular acupuncture
n=19
Anxiety-specific points on the ear
Placebo auricular acupuncture
n=19
Points with no known anxiolytic effect
Intranasal midazolam
n=19
4 mg of midazolam administered nasally
No treatment
n=10
Control with no intervention
📊 Results in numbers
Anxiety reduction (STAI X1) auricular acupuncture vs control
Anxiety reduction (STAI X1) midazolam vs control
Improvement in patient cooperation with auricular acupuncture
Adverse effects with auricular acupuncture
Nasal burning with midazolam
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Reduction in STAI X1 score at 30 minutes
This study showed that auricular acupuncture is as effective as midazolam (an anxiolytic) for reducing anxiety before dental extractions. Auricular acupuncture offers the advantage of not causing side effects such as prolonged drowsiness or burning sensation, making it a safe and natural alternative for controlling dental anxiety.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Anxiety related to dental treatment is a common experience that affects millions of people around the world. It is estimated that approximately one-third of adults have fear of dental procedures, while about 10% develop a true dental phobia. This condition not only causes suffering to patients, but can also lead to canceled appointments, delayed treatment, and consequent deterioration of oral health. For many people, the fear is so intense that they end up requiring hospital sedation for routine dental procedures, such as dental extractions.
Traditionally, anxiolytic medications such as midazolam have been used to control this anxiety, but there is always concern about side effects such as respiratory depression and prolonged sedation. In this context, complementary therapies such as auricular acupuncture emerge as promising alternatives, offering potential anxiety relief without the risks associated with sedative medications.
This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Hannover Medical School in Germany, with the goal of directly comparing the efficacy of auricular acupuncture with intranasal midazolam in the treatment of dental anxiety. The researchers recruited 67 patients who needed dental extractions and randomly assigned them to four different groups. The first group received true auricular acupuncture, with needles inserted at specific points on the ear known to produce relaxation. The second group received placebo auricular acupuncture, where blunt needles were applied at points that have no proven effect on anxiety.
The third group received intranasal midazolam, an anxiolytic medication well established in clinical practice. The fourth group served as a control, receiving no specific anxiety treatment. To measure anxiety levels, the researchers used scientifically validated questionnaires, including the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and visual analog scales. They also continuously monitored patients' vital signs, such as heart rate and oxygen saturation, and assessed the level of sedation and the quality of dental treatment conditions.
The results demonstrated that both auricular acupuncture and intranasal midazolam were significantly more effective in reducing dental anxiety compared with the group that received no treatment. Interestingly, there was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between auricular acupuncture and midazolam, suggesting that both approaches offer similar benefits in anxiety control. The beneficial effects were observed as early as 30 minutes after the start of the interventions, demonstrating a relatively rapid onset of action for both treatments. In addition, dentists reported better working conditions and greater patient cooperation in the groups that received auricular acupuncture or midazolam, compared with the control group.
A particularly interesting aspect was that, although the group that received placebo acupuncture also showed some improvement in anxiety, it was smaller than in the groups with active treatments, suggesting that the benefits observed are not due exclusively to placebo effect. The researchers observed that some patients in the midazolam group reported temporary nasal burning, while no adverse effects were reported in the acupuncture groups.
The clinical implications of this study are important for both patients and dental professionals. For patients, the results offer evidence that auricular acupuncture may be an effective and safe alternative to traditional anxiolytic medications. This is especially relevant for people who prefer to avoid medications, have contraindications to the use of benzodiazepines, or are concerned about side effects such as prolonged sedation. Auricular acupuncture offers the additional advantage of not causing respiratory depression or prolonged cognitive impairment, allowing patients to resume their normal activities more quickly after dental treatment.
For dentists and other oral health professionals, auricular acupuncture represents an additional tool in the management of dental anxiety, complementing existing pharmacological and behavioral strategies. The procedure is relatively simple to learn and apply, requires minimal equipment, and can be easily integrated into routine clinical practice. In addition, by improving patient cooperation and working conditions, it can contribute to more efficient and successful dental treatments.
It is important to recognize some limitations of this study that should be considered when interpreting the results. The number of participants was relatively small, especially in the control group, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to larger populations. In addition, it was not possible to maintain complete blinding in all groups, since patients could perceive whether they were receiving intranasal medication, acupuncture, or no specific treatment. This methodological limitation is common in studies comparing such different interventions.
The study also did not systematically assess pain during the procedure, which could influence the reported anxiety levels. Another aspect to consider is that all participants were patients who required dental extractions, and the results may not apply directly to other types of dental procedures or to patients with different baseline levels of dental anxiety.
Despite these limitations, this study represents a valuable contribution to the scientific literature on the management of dental anxiety, being the first to directly compare auricular acupuncture with an established anxiolytic medication. The results suggest that auricular acupuncture deserves serious consideration as a complementary therapeutic option in the treatment of dental anxiety. For patients who suffer from fear of dental procedures, this research offers hope that there are effective and safe alternatives to traditional medications. The researchers conclude that future studies with larger populations are needed to confirm these findings, but encourage dentists to consider auricular acupuncture as an adjunct to conventional anxiety management strategies.
This integrative approach, combining the best of conventional and complementary medicine, can offer patients a more comfortable and less stressful dental experience, contributing to better oral health outcomes in the long term.
Strengths
- 1First study directly comparing auricular acupuncture with standard medication
- 2Included placebo group to control for psychological effects
- 3Objective assessment of patient cooperation by the dentist
- 4Absence of adverse effects with auricular acupuncture
Limitations
- 1Relatively small sample (67 participants)
- 2Impossibility of blinding the acupuncturist
- 3Control group smaller than the intervention groups
- 4Did not evaluate postoperative pain as a possible confounder
Expert Commentary
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai
PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo
▸ Clinical Relevance
Dental anxiety is underdiagnosed and undertreated in general practice, and this trial by Karst et al. fills a relevant gap by positioning auricular acupuncture as a real alternative to intranasal midazolam — not merely as an adjuvant, but as equivalent in anxiolytic efficacy as measured by the STAI X1. For the physician caring for patients with contraindications to benzodiazepines — cardiac patients on opioids, pregnant patients in the first trimester, patients with a history of substance dependence, or those with nasal obstruction that precludes the intranasal route — preprocedural auricular acupuncture offers a pharmacologically neutral and fast-acting route. The statistically significant improvement in dentist-rated cooperation reinforces that the benefit extends beyond subjective self-report, translating into objectively superior operating conditions. This finding is of direct interest to any service performing invasive outpatient procedures.
▸ Notable Findings
The most striking finding is not simply the efficacy of auricular acupuncture in reducing anxiety, but its functional equivalence to midazolam — no statistically significant difference between the two active groups — combined with a profile of zero adverse effects versus 36.8% nasal burning in the pharmacological group. The response consolidated within 30 minutes, a clinically operational window that fits perfectly within the flow of a dental waiting room. Another notable finding is the difference between active and placebo auricular acupuncture: the group with non-specific points improved less, suggesting that the specificity of the auricular points for anxiety contributes independently to the expectancy effect. This is relevant for those following the debate on placebo effect in acupuncture — in this context, the point matters.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice at the Pain Center of HC-FMUSP, I have used auricular acupuncture as non-pharmacological premedication in patients who arrive at the outpatient clinic with intense anticipatory anxiety before procedures such as blocks and infiltrations. The response is usually perceptible while still in the waiting room, within 20 to 30 minutes after needle insertion — consistent with what Karst et al. observed. For situational, isolated anxiety, a single well-targeted session is often sufficient; for established dental phobia, I usually recommend two to three preparatory sessions before the main procedure. I routinely combine it with guided diaphragmatic breathing, which potentiates the anxiolytic effect at no additional cost. The patient profile that responds best in my experience is one with context-reactive anxiety, without a structured anxiety disorder — exactly the typical patient of a dental clinic who avoids the chair out of fear, not out of underlying psychopathology.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Anesthesia & Analgesia · 2007
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000242531.12722.fd
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories