Skip to content

The effects of acupuncture on rates of clinical pregnancy among women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Manheimer et al. · Human Reproduction Update · 2013

🔬Systematic Review and Meta-analysis👥n=4,021 participantsHigh Methodological Impact

Evidence Level

MODERATE
75/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
5/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of acupuncture as an adjunct to in vitro fertilization (IVF) on clinical pregnancy rates

👥

WHO

4,021 women undergoing IVF in 16 randomized controlled trials

⏱️

DURATION

Acupuncture administered within 1 day of embryo transfer

📍

POINTS

Traditional acupuncture points with varied protocols, applied before and/or after transfer

🔬 Study Design

4021participants
randomization

Acupuncture

n=2012

1-3 sessions of traditional acupuncture

Control

n=2009

Sham acupuncture or no adjunct treatment

⏱️ Duration: Treatment on the day of embryo transfer

📊 Results in numbers

RR 1.12 (0.96-1.31)

Overall clinical pregnancy rate

RR 1.53 (1.28-1.84)

Rate in clinics with low baseline rate

RR 0.90 (0.80-1.01)

Rate in clinics with high baseline rate

I²=68%

Heterogeneity between studies

Percentage highlights

I²=68%
Heterogeneity between studies

📊 Outcome Comparison

Clinical pregnancy rate by subgroup

Low baseline rate clinics
53
High baseline rate clinics
90
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study analyzed whether acupuncture can improve the chances of pregnancy in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. The results suggest that acupuncture may be more useful in clinics with lower success rates, but it did not show a significant overall benefit.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This study is the most comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of acupuncture as an adjunct treatment to in vitro fertilization (IVF), analyzing 16 randomized clinical trials involving 4,021 participants from different countries. The main objective was to quantify the overall effects of acupuncture on clinical pregnancy rates in women undergoing IVF and to identify factors that could explain differences between studies. The methodology was rigorous, including searches in multiple medical databases, direct contact with all authors of the included studies to obtain unpublished data, and analysis of 11 prespecified variables to investigate sources of heterogeneity. The researchers separately analyzed studies that used sham acupuncture as a control versus those that used no adjunct treatment.

All included studies evaluated traditional needle acupuncture administered within one day of embryo transfer, with protocols ranging from one to three sessions. The main results showed no statistically significant difference in clinical pregnancy rates when all studies were combined (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.96-1.31), nor when restricted only to sham-controlled studies or to those with no-treatment control. However, substantial heterogeneity was observed between studies (I²=68%), indicating considerable variability in results. Subgroup analysis revealed a clinically important finding: the baseline pregnancy rate of the clinics was the only statistically significant modifier of the acupuncture effect.

Studies conducted in clinics with lower baseline pregnancy rates (below 32%) showed significant benefits from acupuncture (RR 1.53, 1.28-1.84), while studies in clinics with higher rates demonstrated no benefit (RR 0.90, 0.80-1.01). This variable explained 93% of the heterogeneity between studies. The clinical implications suggest that acupuncture may be more beneficial as an adjunct to IVF in settings where success rates are already lower, possibly because in environments with high success rates, the additional value of complementary interventions is limited. Regarding safety, no serious adverse events associated with acupuncture were reported in the seven studies that described adverse events.

Miscarriage rates were similar between groups. Limitations include the possibility of publication bias, as suggested by the asymmetric funnel plot, where smaller studies tended to show more favorable results. In addition, the analysis of multiple subgroups increases the risk of false-positive findings, and unidentified factors may confound the observed relationship between baseline pregnancy rate and acupuncture efficacy.

Strengths

  • 1Comprehensive review with extensive search across multiple databases
  • 2Acquisition of unpublished data from all study authors
  • 3Rigorous analysis of prespecified subgroups to explain heterogeneity
  • 4Transparent methodology with prospectively registered protocol
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Evidence of publication bias suggested by the asymmetric funnel plot
  • 2Substantial heterogeneity between studies (I²=68%)
  • 3Risk of multiple comparisons in subgroup analyses
  • 4Possible confounding by unidentified factors in baseline rate analysis
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

Female infertility treated by IVF represents a setting of very high emotional and financial burden for patients, and any adjunctive intervention that can improve success rates deserves careful evaluation. The central finding of this meta-analysis — that acupuncture demonstrates expressive benefit (RR 1.53) specifically in clinics with baseline pregnancy rates below 32% — provides the physician with a practical criterion for selecting candidates. Centers with more limited technological infrastructure, or patients with more guarded reproductive prognoses, constitute the population in which acupuncture as an adjunct to embryo transfer has the greatest clinical justification. The favorable safety profile, with no serious adverse events and no increase in miscarriage rates, reinforces the feasibility of its incorporation into the perioperative IVF protocol as a low-risk intervention with potential selective benefit.

Notable Findings

The most sophisticated finding of this review is not the overall result — which did not reach statistical significance — but rather the identification of the clinics' baseline pregnancy rate as an effect modifier capable of explaining 93% of the heterogeneity between studies (I²=68%). This level of variance explanation by a single subgroup variable is uncommon in acupuncture meta-analyses and gives clinical substance to what could be dismissed as a null result. The reversal of the effect between the two subgroups — from a favorable RR 1.53 in low-performance clinics to a neutral-to-unfavorable RR 0.90 in high-performance clinics — suggests a therapeutic ceiling phenomenon that is biologically plausible: in environments where technical factors already optimize outcomes to the maximum, the room for gain from adjunctive interventions is genuinely narrow.

From My Experience

In my practice with the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center, we have been seeing patients referred from assisted reproduction services with growing frequency over recent years. The protocol we have consolidated involves sessions on the days close to embryo transfer — before and after the procedure — with emphasis on points classically associated with uterine warming and Qi (氣) regulation, such as Zusanli (足三里, ST-36), Sanyinjiao (三陰交, SP-6), and Guanyuan (關元, CV-4). I usually observe that patients with a history of repeated implantation failures, generally with two or more failed cycles, are the ones who report the greatest subjective sense of benefit, which directly aligns with the low-baseline-rate clinic subgroup identified in this paper. I do not indicate isolated acupuncture as a substitute for specialized reproductive care, but as an integrative adjunct, especially when the patient is already engaged with complementary approaches. The response profile I see is not immediate — the effect, when present, is reflected in the transfer outcome, not in symptomatic improvement perceptible during the session.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Human Reproduction Update · 2013

DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmt026

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.