Skip to content

Ear Acupuncture according to the NADA (National Acupuncture Detoxification Association)

Litscher G. · Medicines · 2019

📝Editorial/Narrative Review📚27 studies analyzed⚖️Mixed evidence
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To review and summarize the scientific evidence on the NADA auriculotherapy protocol for the treatment of substance dependence

👥

WHO

Patients with drug, alcohol, and cocaine dependence and other behavioral disorders

⏱️

DURATION

Review of 47 years of research (1972-2019)

📍

POINTS

5 auricular points: Sympathetic, Shen Men, Kidney, Liver, and Lung

🔬 Study Design

27participants
randomization

NADA Studies

n=27

Review of publications on the NADA protocol

⏱️ Duration: Analysis of 47 years of literature

📊 Results in numbers

27 publications

Studies retrieved on PubMed

More than 30 years

Period of development

Mixed/limited

Evidence of efficacy

Multiple conditions

Clinical applications

📊 Outcome Comparison

Quality of evidence by area

Opioid dependence
3
Cocaine dependence
2
Anxiety
2
Treatment retention
4
💬 What does this mean for you?

The NADA protocol is a specific ear acupuncture technique that uses 5 standardized points to help in the treatment of substance dependence and behavioral problems. Although it has been widely used for over 30 years, the scientific evidence is mixed, with some studies showing benefits and others finding no significant differences.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This editorial presents a comprehensive review of the auriculotherapy protocol of the National Acupuncture Detoxification Association (NADA), a complementary technique developed for the treatment of substance dependence that has been used for more than three decades. The NADA protocol uses five specific points in the ear: Sympathetic, Shen Men, Kidney, Liver, and Lung, applied in a standardized manner to assist in the detoxification and recovery process of patients with substance dependence.

The history of the NADA protocol dates back to 1972-1973, when Dr. H.L. Wen of Hong Kong first reported the use of acupuncture with electrical stimulation at four body points and two auricular points to assist in opioid withdrawal syndrome. Subsequent development was led by Dr.

Michael Smith of New York, who in 1985 refined the protocol to use only auricular points. In 1988, Smith and Khan published results from 200 patients treated at Lincoln Hospital in New York over 13 years, reporting subjective successes, although without objective scientific verification at the time.

The review analyzes 27 referenced publications retrieved on PubMed up to March 2019, revealing a complex picture of scientific evidence. Subsequent studies have produced mixed results regarding the efficacy of the protocol. A 2004 Swedish study with 163 prisoners over 18 months found no significant differences compared with other methods, although there were no negative side effects. Similarly, reviews on the treatment of cocaine dependence have not been able to confirm the effectiveness of acupuncture for this type of substance abuse.

Subsequent studies have explored various applications of the NADA protocol. A 2005 Yale University study with 40 HIV-positive cocaine users did not demonstrate measurable success of acupuncture in isolation, but patients who received group therapy in addition to acupuncture showed a greater reduction in depression and anxiety. A 2011 Canadian study comparing NADA with sham acupuncture and a control found no superiority of the protocol in reducing anxiety.

Nevertheless, some applications have shown promising results. At the University of Colorado, 185 patients completed a study in which use of NADA was positively correlated with successful study completion and smoking cessation. Austrian researchers successfully used the protocol in an adolescent patient with phantom pain after osteosarcoma surgery, and German studies implemented the method in geriatric patients with major depression, observing significant pre-post treatment improvements.

A 2016 systematic review focused specifically on randomized trials using the NADA protocol for opioid use disorder found only four studies that met the inclusion criteria. The results indicated that, although the NADA protocol may not be effective in reducing acute opioid craving or withdrawal syndrome, it can be effectively used as adjuvant treatment to increase treatment retention and decrease methadone doses during detoxification and maintenance.

The applications of the NADA protocol have expanded beyond substance dependence to include anxiety disorders, major depression, impulsivity control, and even neonatal abstinence syndrome in babies of mothers with substance dependence. Recent studies suggest that the protocol may be particularly useful as a psychosocial intervention that affects the whole person, potentiating the results of other treatment modalities.

Despite its broad clinical implementation, the limitations of the scientific evidence are evident. Many studies have small samples, lack adequate control groups, or yield inconsistent results. The variability in study designs and populations investigated makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the efficacy of the protocol. The clinical implications suggest that NADA may be most effective as adjuvant therapy in integrated treatment programs, particularly for improving treatment retention and reducing associated symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Strengths

  • 1Standardized and replicable protocol with 5 specific points
  • 2More than 30 years of documented clinical use
  • 3Applicability across multiple conditions beyond substance dependence
  • 4Non-pharmacological intervention with no reported side effects
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Inconsistent and often contradictory scientific evidence
  • 2Many studies with small samples and limited methodology
  • 3Lack of high-quality randomized clinical trials
  • 4Difficulty in establishing adequate placebo controls for acupuncture
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

The NADA protocol occupies a genuine niche in integrative medicine for substance dependence, and its practical strength lies precisely in standardization: five fixed auricular points — Sympathetic, Shen Men, Kidney, Liver, and Lung — applicable by a trained physician without the need for individualized energy diagnosis at each session. This makes it viable in high-demand settings, such as detoxification units, CAPS AD (Brazilian alcohol and drug addiction care centers), and outpatient programs for the treatment of alcohol and other drug use. The most clinically operational finding of this review is that the protocol works best as an adjuvant: it improves treatment retention and may reduce methadone doses, two outcomes with a direct impact on care costs and long-term adherence. Populations with psychiatric comorbidities — anxiety, major depression, and impulsivity — also emerge as reasonable candidates, particularly when the pharmacological route is limited by polypharmacy or by the inherent toxicity of the substances in use.

Notable Findings

Among the 27 studies retrieved on PubMed after nearly five decades of clinical use, the most revealing finding is the asymmetry between massive clinical adoption and a still modest evidence base. The 2016 systematic review — which filtered only four randomized trials for opioid use disorder — accurately summarizes where the protocol effectively contributes: not in the acute suppression of craving or withdrawal syndrome, but in treatment retention and the reduction of methadone doses. Equally noteworthy is the expansion of indications: from the Austrian study with phantom pain in an adolescent post-osteosarcoma to the use in geriatric patients with major depression with significant pre-post improvement, and even to neonatal abstinence syndrome. The Colorado finding — where NADA exposure was positively correlated with study completion and smoking cessation in 185 patients — suggests a facilitating effect on therapeutic engagement that goes beyond a purely analgesic or anxiolytic mechanism.

From My Experience

In my practice, the NADA protocol is the situation in which auriculotherapy comes closest to a public health intervention: it can be offered in a group, with sessions of 30 to 45 minutes, without elaborate diagnostic individualization, which facilitates scaling in public services. I have observed that patients in alcohol and opioid withdrawal report a subjective reduction in anxiety and insomnia within the first three to five sessions, which substantially improves their connection with the program. At the Pain Center, we use auriculotherapy mainly as an adjuvant to multimodal treatment, never as monotherapy, and the patient profile that responds best to NADA is the one with a high level of anticipatory anxiety and difficulty with adherence — exactly those who most often abandon conventional treatment. I usually plan cycles of eight to twelve sessions before reassessing the response. When there is severe depressive comorbidity or active psychosis, auriculotherapy enters subordinated to psychiatric management, never ahead of it.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Medicines · 2019

DOI: 10.3390/medicines6020044

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.