Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture for Essential Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis
Chen et al. · Medical Science Monitor · 2018
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of essential hypertension
WHO
2,107 patients with essential hypertension (SBP ≥140 mmHg or DBP ≥90 mmHg)
DURATION
Median of 28 days of treatment (range 14-56 days)
POINTS
LI-11 (Quchi), LR-3 (Taichong), GB-20 (Fengchi), ST-36 (Zusanli), GV-20 (Baihui) — most used
🔬 Study Design
Acupuncture + antihypertensive medication
n=1054
acupuncture sessions combined with medications
Antihypertensive medication alone
n=1053
standard pharmacological treatment
📊 Results in numbers
SBP reduction with acupuncture + medication vs medication
DBP reduction with acupuncture + medication vs medication
Acupuncture vs medication — SBP difference
Efficacy rate of acupuncture + medication
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Systolic blood pressure reduction (mmHg)
Diastolic blood pressure reduction (mmHg)
This study shows that acupuncture may be useful as a complementary treatment alongside medication for hypertension, enhancing the effects of the drugs. However, acupuncture alone was not shown to be sufficient to control blood pressure when compared with conventional medications.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
This 2018 meta-analysis represents one of the most comprehensive reviews of acupuncture in the treatment of essential hypertension, including 30 randomized clinical trials with 2,107 patients. The study investigated different acupuncture modalities, including manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture, and combinations with antihypertensive medications and lifestyle modifications. The investigators conducted a systematic search of multiple databases through April 2017, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Chinese databases, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the available literature. The methodology rigorously followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO, ensuring transparency and reproducibility.
The acupuncture points most frequently used in the studies were LI-11 (Quchi), LR-3 (Taichong), GB-20 (Fengchi), ST-36 (Zusanli), and GV-20 (Baihui), reflecting traditional Chinese practice for the treatment of hypertension. The principal results showed that acupuncture combined with antihypertensive medications was significantly more effective than medications alone, producing additional reductions of 9.8 mmHg in systolic and 7.82 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure. Subgroup analysis revealed that this synergy was particularly evident when acupuncture was combined with calcium channel blockers. Interestingly, when compared on its own with antihypertensive medications, acupuncture showed similar but not superior efficacy, calling into question its appropriateness as monotherapy.
Comparison with sham acupuncture revealed no significant differences, raising questions about the specific mechanisms of action. In terms of safety, the few adverse events reported were mild, including local pain, minor bleeding, and occasionally dizziness, demonstrating an acceptable safety profile. However, the authors identified important limitations in the methodological quality of the included studies. Most showed a high risk of bias, particularly related to inadequate randomization, lack of appropriate blinding, and small sample sizes.
The quality analysis revealed significant differences between publications in English and Chinese, with the Chinese studies showing less methodological rigor. Substantial heterogeneity among studies (I²>50% in most analyses) suggests considerable variability in treatment protocols, selection criteria, and outcome measures. The findings have important clinical implications, suggesting that acupuncture may serve as a valuable adjunctive therapy in the management of hypertension, potentially allowing reduction of medication doses or better blood pressure control in patients with inadequate response to pharmacotherapy alone. The evidence of synergy with conventional medications supports an integrative approach to the treatment of hypertension.
Strengths
- 1Largest meta-analysis of acupuncture for hypertension to date
- 2Subgroup analyses by antihypertensive drug class
- 3Rigorous methodology following PRISMA guidelines
- 4Comprehensive appraisal of study quality
- 5Broad search including Chinese databases
Limitations
- 1High heterogeneity among studies (I²>50%)
- 2Low methodological quality of most included RCTs
- 3Lack of adequate blinding in most studies
- 4Small sample sizes
- 5Possible publication bias detected
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
Essential hypertension remains one of the greatest treatment-adherence challenges we face in clinical practice. What this meta-analysis brings of operationally relevant value is the magnitude of the additive effect of acupuncture on pharmacotherapy: reductions of 9.8 mmHg in systolic and 7.82 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure are differences with real cardiovascular impact, not just statistical impact. For the patient who remains uncontrolled despite two or three antihypertensives, or who experiences dose-limiting adverse effects, acupuncture becomes an adjunctive option with quantitative backing. The synergy documented specifically with calcium channel blockers opens a line of reasoning: the autonomic modulation promoted by acupuncture may potentiate the vasodilatory mechanisms already activated by this drug class. This guides therapeutic combination decisions with some pathophysiological rationale, not just empiricism.
▸ Notable Findings
The finding that most stands out is not simply the efficacy of the combination, but the pharmacological specificity of the synergy. The acupuncture-calcium channel blocker interaction suggesting a preferential mechanistic pathway is a data point that goes beyond the descriptive level and opens hypotheses about modulation of the autonomic nervous system and vasomotor tone. Equally relevant is the predominant profile of points used — LI-11, LR-3, GB-20, ST-36, and GV-20 — which converge with those that stimulate central noradrenergic and serotonergic pathways in animal models of blood pressure regulation. The finding that acupuncture alone produced efficacy comparable but not superior to medication indicates that its role is not as a substitute but as a potentiator. Finally, the 17% higher efficacy rate in the combined group, with a predominantly mild adverse-event profile, reinforces the favorable risk-benefit relationship for adjunctive use.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice in the pain and rehabilitation clinic, I have followed hypertensive patients with musculoskeletal comorbidities for whom acupuncture is part of the integrative plan. What I routinely observe is that, when there is consistent patient engagement, we see improvement in blood pressure control measured at follow-up visits starting in the third or fourth week of treatment — something that aligns with the 14 to 56 days of duration in the studies included in this meta-analysis. I typically work with cycles of 10 to 12 sessions before making a formal response assessment. The profile that responds best, in my observation, is the stage 1 or 2 hypertensive patient with a clear autonomic-stress component — that patient with marked blood pressure variability throughout the day who is already on a calcium channel blocker. I do not indicate acupuncture as antihypertensive monotherapy in any scenario; the article confirms what we already practice: it is adjunctive, not a substitute.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Medical Science Monitor · 2018
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.909995
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories