Adenosine A1 receptors mediate local anti-nociceptive effects of acupuncture
Goldman et al. · Nature Neuroscience · 2010
Evidence Level
STRONGOBJECTIVE
To investigate the biological mechanism of the analgesic effects of acupuncture, focusing on the role of adenosine
WHO
C57BL/6J mice with inflammatory and neuropathic pain
DURATION
Acupuncture sessions of 30 minutes with follow-up of several hours
POINTS
Zusanli (ST-36) — located 3-4 mm below and 1-2 mm lateral to the midline of the knee
🔬 Study Design
Wild-type control
n=40
Traditional acupuncture
A1 knockout
n=40
Acupuncture in mice lacking A1 receptors
Pentostatin (deoxycoformycin)
n=40
Acupuncture + deaminase inhibitor
📊 Results in numbers
Increase in adenosine during acupuncture
Improvement in tactile sensitivity
Reduction in fEPSP amplitude
Prolongation of effect with pentostatin
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Touch sensitivity (% negative responses)
This study revealed for the first time how acupuncture works biologically to relieve pain. The investigators discovered that acupuncture releases a natural substance called adenosine, which acts as a local analgesic by blocking pain signals in the nerves. This scientifically explains why acupuncture has local effects and why it works best when applied near the site of pain.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
This pioneering study published in Nature Neuroscience in 2010 unraveled the fundamental biological mechanism of acupuncture's analgesic effects, an age-old practice that had until then lacked a solid scientific explanation. Researchers at the University of Rochester, led by Maiken Nedergaard, used sophisticated experimental models in mice to investigate how acupuncture produces pain relief at the molecular level. The methodology involved creating two chronic pain models: inflammatory pain induced by complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) and neuropathic pain by sciatic nerve ligation. The investigators applied traditional acupuncture at the Zusanli (ST-36) point, inserting needles to a depth of 1.5 mm and performing manual rotation every 5 minutes for 30 minutes.
To monitor biochemical changes, they used microdialysis to collect samples of interstitial fluid near the acupuncture point, analyzing purine levels by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The results revealed that acupuncture causes a dramatic 24-fold increase in extracellular adenosine concentration, a neuromodulator with well-established anti-nociceptive properties. This increase occurs through ATP release during needle manipulation, followed by its rapid enzymatic degradation to adenosine. Crucially, the study demonstrated that acupuncture's analgesic effects depend entirely on adenosine A1 receptor expression, as genetically modified mice without these receptors showed no pain relief after treatment.
Direct administration of the A1 agonist CCPA completely replicated the effects of acupuncture, confirming that activation of these receptors is both necessary and sufficient for the analgesic effect. The investigators used electrophysiological recordings from the anterior cingulate cortex to demonstrate that adenosine acts locally, suppressing pain signal transmission in unmyelinated C fibers near the acupuncture point. The most notable innovation of the study was the discovery that acupuncture's effects can be potentiated pharmacologically. The investigators identified AMP deaminase as a bottleneck in adenosine metabolism, diverting AMP to IMP rather than adenosine.
Using pentostatin (deoxycoformycin), an FDA-approved deaminase inhibitor, they significantly prolonged acupuncture's analgesic effects from 1-1.5 hours to 3-3.5 hours. This finding opens important clinical prospects for maximizing the therapeutic benefits of acupuncture. The clinical implications are substantial, as the study provides the first robust mechanistic explanation for acupuncture's local and ipsilateral effects, reconciling this traditional practice with evidence-based medicine. The work suggests that drugs that interfere with adenosine metabolism may be used as adjuvants to prolong the clinical effects of acupuncture.
Limitations include the exclusive use of murine models, the need for validation in humans, and questions about generalization to acupuncture points beyond Zusanli. Despite these limitations, this study represents a milestone in the scientific understanding of acupuncture and lays the foundation for the development of more effective therapeutic approaches.
Strengths
- 1First robust mechanistic explanation for the effects of acupuncture
- 2Use of multiple complementary methodological approaches
- 3Identification of a pharmacological strategy to potentiate the effects
- 4Experimental rigor with appropriate genetic controls
- 5Translational clinical relevance
Limitations
- 1Limited to murine models
- 2Focus on only one acupuncture point (Zusanli)
- 3Need for validation in human clinical studies
- 4Limited duration of follow-up
- 5Questions about generalization to other types of pain
Expert Commentary
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai
PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo
▸ Clinical Relevance
The work of Goldman and colleagues, published in Nature Neuroscience in 2010, represents a turning point in how we justify acupuncture to contemporary scientific scrutiny. By demonstrating that needle manipulation at ST-36 raises extracellular adenosine concentration 24-fold and that this increase is the necessary and sufficient mediator of local analgesia, the study offers a mechanistic framework for guiding concrete clinical decisions. In practice, this reinforces the rationale for applying needles near the painful territory — a strategy we had already employed empirically — and points to populations with peripheral inflammatory and neuropathic pain as the most likely beneficiaries. Patients with knee osteoarthritis, low back pain with a myofascial component, and painful diabetic polyneuropathy fit this profile well, and the adenosinergic understanding supports why integrative acupuncture, combined with conventional analgesics, may produce relevant synergistic effects in these contexts.
▸ Notable Findings
Two findings deserve special attention. The first is the absolute dependence on A1 receptors: knockout mice for this receptor did not respond to acupuncture, while administration of the A1 agonist CCPA fully reproduced the analgesia. This goes beyond correlation — it establishes molecular causality and explains the interindividual variability in response that we observe clinically, since polymorphisms in purinergic receptors may modulate treatment efficacy. The second finding is the pharmacological potentiation with pentostatin, an FDA-approved AMP deaminase inhibitor: by redirecting AMP metabolism toward adenosine instead of IMP, the analgesic effect was prolonged from 1-1.5 hours to 3-3.5 hours. The idea that an already-existing drug class can amplify and stabilize the effect of acupuncture transforms the relationship between the technique and pharmacology from competitive to complementary.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center, I usually observe the first measurable responses between the third and fifth sessions in most patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, and the therapeutic plateau tends to consolidate around 8 to 12 sessions, after which we transition to biweekly or monthly maintenance according to evolution. The finding about prolonged effect with pentostatin resonates directly with something I have observed over the years: patients on xanthines or dipyridamole — substances that interfere with adenosinergic metabolism — appear, in some cases, to show slightly more durable response, although this clinical impression lacks systematic confirmation. As for the responder profile, patients with predominantly peripheral, inflammatory, or focally distributed neuropathic pain tend to benefit more than those with pure central sensitization syndromes. In the latter, I combine acupuncture with central modulation — duloxetine or pregabalin — because the local adenosinergic pathway alone rarely resolves a central nervous system that is already hyperexcited.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Nature Neuroscience · 2010
DOI: 10.1038/nn.2562
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories