Skip to content

Optimizing acupuncture treatment for dry eye syndrome: a systematic review

Kim et al. · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · 2018

🔍Systematic Review👥n=1126 participantsHigh Clinical Impact

Evidence Level

MODERATE
72/ 100
Quality
3/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture for dry eye syndrome and optimize treatment protocols

👥

WHO

1,126 patients with dry eye syndrome from 19 studies

⏱️

DURATION

Treatments ranged from 3 weeks to 2 months

📍

POINTS

BL-1, BL-2, ST-1, ST-2, TE-23, Ex-HN5 (periorbital points predominated)

🔬 Study Design

1126participants
randomization

Manual acupuncture

n=734

traditional acupuncture

Artificial tears

n=594

lubricating eye drops

Acupuncture + tears

n=392

combined therapy

⏱️ Duration: 3 weeks to 8 weeks

📊 Results in numbers

2.14 mm (95% CI: 0.93-3.34)

Schirmer test

0.98 s (95% CI: 0.79-1.18)

Tear film break-up time

I²=62%

BUT heterogeneity

I²=96%

Schirmer heterogeneity

Percentage highlights

I²=62%
BUT heterogeneity
I²=96%
Schirmer heterogeneity

📊 Outcome Comparison

Schirmer test (improvement in mm)

Acupuncture
2.14
Artificial Tears
0
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study shows that acupuncture is more effective than artificial tears for treating dry eye, improving tear production and tear film stability. The treatment is most effective when performed for more than 1 month, 2-3 times per week, while avoiding certain specific points.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Dry eye syndrome is a multifactorial condition affecting the tears and ocular surface, causing discomfort and visual problems. With population aging and increased use of electronic devices, its prevalence has grown significantly. This systematic review investigated the efficacy of acupuncture in treating this condition, analyzing 19 randomized controlled studies with 1,126 participants. The researchers sought not only to confirm the effectiveness of acupuncture but, primarily, to optimize treatment protocols through detailed subgroup analyses.

The methodology included a search of 10 international databases, with rigorous inclusion criteria focused on trials comparing acupuncture with artificial tears. Primary results were evaluated through the Schirmer test (which measures tear production) and tear film break-up time. The meta-analysis demonstrated significant superiority of acupuncture over artificial tears in both primary outcomes. On the Schirmer test, acupuncture showed a mean improvement of 2.14 mm (95% CI: 0.93-3.34), while break-up time improved by 0.98 seconds (95% CI: 0.79-1.18).

Subgroup analyses revealed important insights for clinical optimization. Treatments lasting more than 1 month were more effective than shorter protocols, suggesting the need for adequate time to consolidate therapeutic effects. Counterintuitively, a lower session frequency (less than 3 times per week) was superior to intensive treatments, indicating that recovery periods between sessions may be beneficial. The specific analysis of acupuncture points showed that regimens including BL-2 (Zanzhu) and ST-1 (Chengqi) were less effective than protocols that avoided these points.

This finding suggests important positional specificity, possibly related to the proximity of these points to nerve blocks that could reduce conjunctival sensitivity and consequent tear production. The combination of acupuncture with artificial tears showed a synergistic effect on tear production but not on tear film stabilization, suggesting complementary mechanisms of action. Despite the positive results, the review identified high heterogeneity among studies (I²=62-96%), not reduced by subgroup analyses, indicating significant variability in protocols and populations studied. The methodological quality of the included studies was variable, with only some presenting adequate randomization, allocation concealment, and assessor blinding.

The clinical implications are substantial. Acupuncture emerges as a valid therapeutic alternative for dry eye syndrome, especially considering the limitations of artificial tears regarding duration of effect and need for frequent application. The suggested optimized protocol includes treatment for more than 1 month, frequency of 2-3 sessions per week, focusing on periorbital points except BL-2 and ST-1. Limitations include high unexplained heterogeneity, variable methodological quality of primary studies, and the need for more research on electroacupuncture and other modalities.

Future studies should focus on protocol standardization, long-term follow-up, and investigation of the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms.

Strengths

  • 1Large sample with 1,126 participants
  • 2Detailed subgroup analysis for optimization
  • 3Comprehensive search across multiple databases
  • 4Rigorous methodology following Cochrane guidelines
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1High heterogeneity not reduced by analyses
  • 2Variable methodological quality of studies
  • 3Few studies with long-term follow-up
  • 4Limited data on alternative modalities
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

Dry eye syndrome represents a growing clinical challenge, especially in populations with heavy use of digital devices and in patients with autoimmune conditions or using medications with anticholinergic effects. The central finding of this review — improvement of 2.14 mm on the Schirmer test and 0.98 seconds in tear film break-up time over artificial tears — positions acupuncture as a concrete therapeutic option, not just an adjunct. The finding regarding combination therapy, which produced a synergistic effect on tear production but not on film stabilization, has a direct implication: in patients with predominantly quantitative deficit, combining acupuncture with lubricating eye drops may be the most rational strategy. The optimized protocol — duration greater than one month, frequency of two to three sessions per week, and careful selection of periorbital points — offers the clinician a prescription framework immediately applicable in the outpatient setting.

Notable Findings

The most thought-provoking finding of this review is the inversion of common sense about treatment intensity: regimens with fewer than three sessions per week outperformed more intensive ones, suggesting that adequate intervals between sessions have a functional role, perhaps related to the consolidation of neuroregulatory responses. Equally relevant is the positional specificity identified in subgroups: protocols including BL-2 (Zanzhu) and ST-1 (Chengqi) were consistently less effective. The hypothesis raised — that the proximity of these points to periorbital nerve structures could attenuate conjunctival sensitivity and reduce the lacrimal reflex — connects to findings in ocular surface neurophysiology and concretely changes point selection. That a systematic review is able to generate protocol optimization recommendations from subgroup analyses is, in itself, a level of clinical information rare in this literature.

From My Experience

In my rehabilitation and pain practice, dry eye rarely arrives at the physiatrist as the chief complaint — it appears as a comorbidity in patients with fibromyalgia, Sjögren syndrome, chronic users of tricyclic antidepressants or anticholinergics, or in the postoperative period after refractive surgery. I have been indicating acupuncture in these cases precisely because of the practical limitation of artificial tears, which require frequent reapplication and do not modify the underlying dysfunctional substrate. I usually see some subjective response between the third and fifth session, with more consistent stabilization after four to six weeks of continuous treatment. The finding regarding BL-2 and ST-1 matches my empirical caution about avoiding points very close to the orbital rim in patients with associated blepharospasm. The profile that responds best, in my experience, is the patient with dry eye of neurogenic component or moderate meibomian gland dysfunction, without advanced ocular surface disease — in these cases, acupuncture comes before considering punctal plugs or topical cyclosporine.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · 2018

DOI: 10.1186/s12906-018-2202-0

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.