Skip to content

Effects of different acupuncture methods on polycystic ovarian syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Li et al. · BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies · 2026

🔬Network Meta-analysis👥n=5,937 participantsHigh Clinical Impact

Evidence Level

MODERATE
78/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
5/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To compare different acupuncture techniques in the treatment of PCOS through multidimensional analysis

👥

WHO

5,937 women with PCOS from 59 randomized studies

⏱️

DURATION

Studies ranging from single treatments to multiple sessions

📍

POINTS

Body acupuncture, electroacupuncture, and catgut embedding

🔬 Study Design

5937participants
randomization

Body Acupuncture

n=2280

manual acupuncture with needles

Electroacupuncture

n=1510

acupuncture with electrical stimulation

Catgut Embedding

n=416

absorbable catgut embedded in points

Controls

n=1731

placebo or standard medication

⏱️ Duration: Variable across studies

📊 Results in numbers

0.69 nmol/L

Testosterone reduction vs medication

1.52 points

Hirsutism improvement (electroacupuncture)

0.92-1.74 kg/m²

BMI reduction (catgut)

0%

Increase in pregnancy rate

Percentage highlights

33%
Increase in pregnancy rate

📊 Outcome Comparison

Efficacy for testosterone (SUCRA)

Catgut Embedding
81.7
Acupuncture
65
Electroacupuncture
45

Efficacy for hirsutism (SUCRA)

Electroacupuncture
84.9
Acupuncture
55
Catgut Embedding
40
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study shows that different acupuncture techniques have unique benefits for women with PCOS. Catgut embedding is better for reducing male hormones and weight, electroacupuncture works best for excess hair and glucose, while traditional acupuncture improves the chances of pregnancy.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This network meta-analysis represents the most comprehensive study to date on different acupuncture techniques for polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), analyzing 59 studies with 5,937 participants. PCOS affects 10-13% of women globally, causing menstrual irregularities, infertility, insulin resistance, and metabolic disorders. The study compared three main techniques: traditional body acupuncture, electroacupuncture, and catgut embedding at specific points. The methodology used Bayesian analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence, allowing simultaneous comparison of all interventions.

The results reveal that no single technique is superior for all aspects of PCOS, but each presents specific advantages. For hyperandrogenism, catgut embedding proved most effective in reducing testosterone levels (SUCRA=81.7%), while electroacupuncture was superior for hirsutism, significantly reducing Ferriman-Gallwey scores by 1.52 points compared with placebo. As for metabolic disorders, catgut embedding stood out in reducing body mass index (SUCRA=90.9%) and waist-to-hip ratio (SUCRA=95.3%). Traditional acupuncture was most recommended for reducing triglycerides and increasing HDL, while electroacupuncture proved preferable for reducing LDL and fasting glucose.

Interestingly, conventional medication remained superior for reducing insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). For sex hormone disorders, catgut embedding was most effective in reducing luteinizing hormone and the LH/FSH ratio. Crucially, for infertility, traditional acupuncture significantly increased the pregnancy rate by 33% compared with medication (RR=1.33). Proposed mechanisms include regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, improved insulin sensitivity, and modulation of metabolic pathways.

Acupuncture proved safe, with serious adverse events being extremely rare (0-1.1/10,000). Limitations include significant heterogeneity across studies, variations in acupuncture techniques, different diagnostic criteria, and limited sample sizes for some outcomes. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the overall robustness of the results. This study provides important evidence for personalizing treatment based on the patient's main clinical concerns, suggesting that physicians can choose specific techniques according to the predominant PCOS symptoms.

Strengths

  • 1First network meta-analysis comparing acupuncture techniques for PCOS
  • 2Large sample size (5,937 participants) from multiple studies
  • 3Comprehensive analysis of four main clinical domains
  • 4Robust Bayesian methodology with sensitivity analyses
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1High heterogeneity across studies for multiple outcomes
  • 2Significant variations in acupuncture techniques and point selection
  • 3Limitation to English- and Chinese-language studies only
  • 4Small sample sizes for some specific outcomes
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

PCOS represents one of the most complex therapeutic challenges in reproductive medicine, precisely because its phenotypes are heterogeneous — there is the predominantly hyperandrogenic patient, the one with marked insulin resistance, the one presenting with isolated infertility, and the one who accumulates all these disorders simultaneously. This network meta-analysis, by stratifying benefits by acupuncture technique and by clinical domain, offers the clinician a therapeutic decision map that goes beyond the generic 'acupuncture helps in PCOS.' For the patient with hyperandrogenism and weight gain resistant to conventional measures, catgut embedding emerges as a concrete adjuvant option. For the one in a fertility protocol, body acupuncture with a 33% increase in pregnancy rate over medication alone has immediate relevance. Integration with metformin, antiandrogens, and ovulation inducers can now be guided by clinical profile, not by random preference for one technique.

Notable Findings

The finding that most deserves attention is the dissociation of efficacy among techniques according to the outcome evaluated — no modality dominates all domains, which is biologically plausible and clinically useful. Catgut embedding reaching SUCRA of 90.9% for BMI and 95.3% for waist-to-hip ratio signals a sustained metabolic effect, likely related to prolonged stimulation of the point over days or weeks, a pharmacokinetic differential nonexistent in the other techniques. Electroacupuncture standing out in hirsutism with a 1.52-point reduction on the Ferriman-Gallwey scale is relevant because this outcome rarely responds quickly to any intervention. Equally worth noting is the fact that conventional medication remains superior for HOMA-IR — a reminder that acupuncture is a strategic adjuvant, not a substitute, especially in patients with documented insulin resistance.

From My Experience

In my practice at the Acupuncture Group of the Pain Center at HC-FMUSP, I frequently see patients referred by gynecology with refractory PCOS or with contraindications to combined oral contraceptives. I have observed that hormonal responses usually emerge between the sixth and tenth session, while menstrual changes — more regular cycles — generally appear after eight to twelve weeks of continuous treatment. For metabolic profiles, I usually combine electroacupuncture at points on the stomach and spleen-pancreas meridians with supervised nutritional guidance; the combined results exceed any isolated technique. I have reserved catgut embedding for patients with difficulty adhering to weekly frequency — the prolonged stimulation compensates for the smaller number of sessions. I do not indicate acupuncture as monotherapy when insulin resistance is the central problem and there is associated metabolic syndrome; in these cases, metformin remains irreplaceable, as the study itself confirms by keeping medication superior for HOMA-IR.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies · 2026

DOI: 10.1186/s12906-026-05295-5

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.