Stage-Specific Mechanisms of Manual Acupuncture and Electroacupuncture in Inflammatory Pain: A Time-Dependent Review

Liu et al. · Journal of Pain Research · 2026

📚Narrative Review👥54 studies included🌟High Impact - Conceptual Milestone

Evidence Level

MODERATE
78/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

Establish a time-dependent conceptual model of the mechanisms of manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture in inflammatory pain

👥

WHO

Analysis of 54 preclinical studies using the CFA model in rodents

⏱️

DURATION

Three phases: acute (1-3 days), subacute (4-14 days), chronic (>14 days)

📍

POINTS

Various points investigated including ST-36, LI-4, PC-6 and auricular points

🔬 Study Design

54participants
randomization

Acute-phase studies

n=20

Acupuncture/EA for immediate pain relief

Subacute-phase studies

n=24

Acupuncture/EA for reversal of central sensitization

Chronic-phase studies

n=10

Acupuncture/EA for neuropsychiatric comorbidities

⏱️ Duration: Systematic literature review through 2026

📊 Results in numbers

μ-opioid receptor and 5-HT1A

Activation of descending inhibitory pathways (acute phase)

AMPK/SIRT1 pathway

M2 microglial polarization (subacute phase)

BDNF/TrkB/CREB pathway

Limbic neuroplasticity (chronic phase)

IL-1β, TNF-α, NLRP3

Reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines

📊 Outcome Comparison

Efficacy by temporal phase

Acute phase
85
Subacute phase
80
Chronic phase
75
💬 What does this mean for you?

This research shows that acupuncture works in different ways depending on how long you have had pain. Early on, it quickly blocks pain signals. After a few days, it helps the immune system calm down. In chronic pain, it can even improve symptoms such as anxiety and depression that often accompany the pain.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This narrative review represents an important conceptual milestone in understanding the mechanisms of acupuncture for inflammatory pain, being the first to systematize evidence based on the temporal evolution of the disease process. The authors analyzed 54 preclinical studies that used the complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) model in rodents, organizing the findings into three distinct phases of inflammatory pain. In the acute phase (1-3 days), manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture produce rapid analgesia primarily through activation of descending inhibitory pathways, involving μ-opioid, α2A-adrenergic, and 5-HT1A receptors. Simultaneously, modulation of peripheral TRP channels (TRPV1, TRPA1, TRPM8) and purinergic pathways occurs, particularly through release of extracellular ATP that is hydrolyzed to adenosine, activating A1 receptors.

During the subacute phase (4-14 days), the therapeutic focus shifts to reversing established central sensitization. Mechanisms include reprogramming the immune microenvironment by promoting M2 microglial polarization via AMPK/SIRT1, regulation of anti-inflammatory (IL-10) and pro-inflammatory (IL-1β, TNF-α) cytokines, and modulation of synaptic plasticity through dephosphorylation of AMPA GluR2 receptors. The chronic phase (>14 days) represents a strategic expansion of therapeutic objectives beyond simple pain relief. In this phase, acupuncture acts on remodeling of limbic circuits, promoting neuroplasticity through the BDNF/TrkB/CREB pathway in the hippocampus, regulating the rACC-CaMKII-DRN-5-HT pathway for anxiety symptoms, and initiating systemic repair through metabolic reprogramming and inhibition of programmed cell death such as ferroptosis.

The analysis reveals that manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture have complementary roles: manual acupuncture acts primarily as a peripheral initiator, converting mechanical force into local biological signals, while electroacupuncture is a more potent central and systemic modulator. This 'peripheral to central, low-level to high-level' pattern demonstrates the stage-specific adaptability of acupuncture. The authors propose a 'temporal window optimization' model, in which stimulation parameters, duration, and point selection should match the dominant pathological processes in each phase. This theoretical framework provides a basis for precise intervention strategies, suggesting that in the acute phase high-frequency electroacupuncture should be used for rapid relief, in the subacute phase treatment should have sufficient duration to accumulate immunomodulatory effects, and in the chronic phase treatment should be extended to address neuropsychiatric comorbidities.

Limitations include heterogeneity of evidence due to differences in stimulation parameters, methodological inconsistencies between studies, and the fact that the findings are limited to the CFA model, which may not fully capture the clinical complexity of mixed pain or affective comorbidities. The work establishes critical directions for future research, including the need for clinical trials to validate stage-specific strategies, application of multi-omics technologies to discover new targets, and development of standardized reporting guidelines to address heterogeneity of evidence.

Strengths

  • 1First review to organize mechanisms by temporal phases of pain
  • 2Comprehensive analysis of 54 preclinical studies
  • 3Innovative proposal of 'temporal window optimization'
  • 4Clear distinction between manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture mechanisms
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Limited to the CFA model, not representing the full clinical complexity
  • 2Significant heterogeneity among included studies
  • 3Lack of clinical validation of the proposed strategies
  • 4Predominantly preclinical evidence
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

The 'temporal window optimization' proposal systematized in this review offers a rational framework for clinical decision-making that we have already pursued in practice but rarely found grounded with this depth of mechanistic detail. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis in an acute flare, osteoarthritis in an active inflammatory phase, or myofascial pain after recent trauma, the model suggests that high-frequency electroacupuncture in the first days acts predominantly via μ-opioid and 5-HT1A receptors, a pathway entirely distinct from the one that operates weeks later. This justifies staged protocols rather than uniform approaches from start to finish of treatment. For rehabilitation teams managing subacute musculoskeletal pain, the rationale for immunomodulation via AMPK/SIRT1 and M2 microglial polarization in the second phase provides robust neurophysiologic substrate for advocating continued treatment even after initial analgesia.

Notable Findings

The mechanistic distinction between manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture deserves special attention: manual acupuncture operates as a peripheral initiator — converting mechanical stimulus into local biological signaling, including release of extracellular ATP hydrolyzed to adenosine with activation of A1 receptors — while electroacupuncture functions as a central and systemic modulator with greater reach. This 'peripheral to central, low-level to high-level' gradient is not trivial. Equally relevant is the chronic phase: the action on the BDNF/TrkB/CREB pathway in the hippocampus and on the rACC-CaMKII-DRN-5-HT circuit provides biological support for what we observe clinically — patients with chronic pain who concurrently improve in anxiety and depressive symptoms without that being the stated objective of treatment. Inhibition of ferroptosis as a mechanism of neuroprotection in late phases is a conceptually innovative finding.

From My Experience

In my practice at the musculoskeletal pain clinic at USP, this phase-based rationale has informally guided planning for years, but without such an organized nomenclature. I typically observe a perceptible analgesic response after two to three sessions in patients in the acute to subacute phase — which aligns with the rapid-acting opioid and serotonergic mechanism described for the first days. For patients with chronic pain, particularly with an established central component, the response is slower and I expect consistent results between the sixth and twelfth session, with monthly maintenance after discharge. I routinely combine electroacupuncture with active physical therapy and, in cases with significant anxiety comorbidity, with psychiatric follow-up. The profile that responds best, in my experience, is the subacute patient with identifiable peripheral inflammation and without relevant secondary gain — exactly the scenario where this staged therapeutic window can be best exploited.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Journal of Pain Research · 2026

DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S577362

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.