Acupuncture in diabetic peripheral neuropathy-neurological outcomes of the randomized acupuncture in diabetic peripheral neuropathy trial
Hoerder et al. · World Journal of Diabetes · 2023
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
Investigate the efficacy of acupuncture in improving neurological deficits in patients with type 2 diabetic peripheral neuropathy
WHO
62 adults with type 2 diabetes and moderate to severe peripheral neuropathy
DURATION
24 weeks of follow-up (12 acupuncture sessions over 8 weeks)
POINTS
ST-40, LR-3, EX-LE-10 (Bafeng), SP-6, KI-3 — bilateral points focused on the fibular and tibial nerves
🔬 Study Design
Acupuncture Group
n=31
12 acupuncture sessions over 8 weeks + usual care
Control Group
n=31
Waiting list until week 16 + usual care
📊 Results in numbers
Numbness reduction (NRS-11)
NPSI improvement
TNSc improvement
Treatment adherence
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Numbness Scale (NRS-11) — Week 8
TNSc Score — Week 8
This study shows that acupuncture may help people with diabetes who suffer from numbness and foot pain caused by diabetic neuropathy. Patients who received 12 acupuncture sessions had significant improvement in foot sensitivity and reduction in numbness, effects that lasted up to 4 months after treatment. Acupuncture proved safe, with only mild side effects such as small bruises at the needle site.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the most common complications of diabetes mellitus, affecting approximately 28% of diabetic patients. This condition manifests through numbness, loss of sensation, burning pain, and tingling in the feet, which can lead to gait instability, falls, and unnoticed injuries due to loss of sensation. Unlike neuropathic pain, for which medications are available, there are no effective pharmacological options to treat numbness and loss of sensation, creating an important therapeutic gap. The ACUDPN study was a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial that investigated the effects of acupuncture on neurological deficits in patients with type 2 DPN.
Conducted in Germany between February 2019 and April 2021, the study included 62 participants with a mean age of 68 years, 79% of whom were men. Inclusion criteria were rigorous, including a confirmed diagnosis of DPN with moderate to severe symptoms and objective evidence of nerve conduction impairment. The acupuncture protocol was standardized, using specific bilateral points: ST-40 and ST-34 (stomach meridian), LR-3 (liver meridian), SP-6 (spleen meridian), KI-3 (kidney meridian), and extra points EX-LE-10 'Bafeng' on the feet. These points were strategically selected for their location close to the fibular and tibial nerves, the main nerves affected in DPN.
The intervention group received 12 acupuncture sessions over 8 weeks, while the control group remained on a waiting list until week 16, when they also received the same treatment. Results were notable in multiple aspects. On the 11-point numerical scale for numbness, the acupuncture group showed an improvement of 2.3 points compared to control at week 8 (p < 0.001), representing a 35.4% reduction in subjective perception of numbness. This effect persisted at week 16 with a difference of 2.2 points (32.4% improvement) and was still present at week 24 with a reduction of 1.8 points compared to baseline.
The Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) improved by 12.6 points in the acupuncture group at week 8 (p < 0.001), with persistence of effect at week 16. Neurological examination scores also showed significant improvements. The TNSc (Total Neuropathy Score clinical) improved by 2.0 points at week 8 (p < 0.001) and maintained an improvement of 1.8 points at week 16. The Neuropathy Symptom Score (NSS) showed a difference of 1.3 points favoring acupuncture at week 8 (p < 0.001), persisting at week 16.
The Neuropathy Deficit Score (NDS) also improved by 1.0 point at week 8, with the effect maintained at week 16. Surprisingly, nerve conduction studies performed with the portable NC-stat / DPNCheck device did not show significant changes in sural nerve velocity or amplitude between groups. This discrepancy may be explained by the limitation of the device used, which, although validated for screening, may not have adequate sensitivity to detect changes induced by intervention. The safety of acupuncture was excellent, with only minor adverse effects reported: small local bruises (n=18), transient pain at the needle site (n=5), transient paresthesias (n=7), and drowsiness after treatment (n=5).
Only one patient discontinued due to persistent discomfort after the session. Adherence was notable, with 96.8% of all 744 planned sessions being performed. Limitations of the study include the smaller-than-planned sample size due to COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, the exploratory analysis of neurological outcomes (which were secondary), the absence of blinding of clinical evaluators, and the use of a portable device instead of conventional electroneurography. Additionally, the absence of a sham group may have contributed to a placebo effect, although the persistence of benefits up to 4 months after treatment suggests genuine effects.
This study represents an important advance in the approach to DPN by focusing specifically on improving sensory function and reducing numbness, crucial aspects for preventing complications such as diabetic ulcers and amputations. The results suggest that acupuncture may fill an important therapeutic gap, offering benefits for symptoms that do not respond to conventional pharmacological treatment, with an excellent safety profile in a population already burdened with medications.
Strengths
- 1First study to focus specifically on improving numbness and sensory function
- 2Multicenter design with well-standardized acupuncture protocol
- 3Excellent treatment adherence (96.8%)
- 4Prolonged follow-up demonstrating persistence of effects up to 4 months
- 5Comprehensive neurological assessments with multiple validated instruments
Limitations
- 1Smaller-than-planned sample size due to the pandemic
- 2Absence of sham-control group to control for placebo effect
- 3Clinical evaluators were not blinded
- 4Nerve conduction studies performed with less sensitive portable device
- 5Exploratory analysis of neurological outcomes without correction for multiple comparisons
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy represents one of the clinical scenarios in which conventional medicine simply does not have satisfactory pharmacological answers for numbness and sensory deficit — unlike neuropathic pain, which has gabapentinoids, duloxetine, and tricyclic antidepressants. The ACUDPN trial addresses precisely this gap, demonstrating an improvement of 2.3 points on the numbness scale and 12.6 points on the NPSI after 12 sessions, with persistence of effects through week 16. In physiatric practice, this translates into a direct gain in domains that impact functional safety: protective plantar sensitivity, gait stability, and prevention of silent injuries that culminate in ulcers and amputations. The patient profile most benefited — elderly, polypharmacy, type 2 diabetes with moderate to severe neuropathy — is exactly the one that least tolerates additional pharmacological escalation, making acupuncture a tool of therapeutic integration, not of substitution.
▸ Notable Findings
The data that most stands out is not the isolated magnitude of the improvement, but its persistence: the difference of 2.2 points in numbness and 1.8 points in TNSc were still detectable at weeks 16 and 24, respectively, well beyond the end of the sessions. This contradicts the perception that acupuncture effects are ephemeral and dependent on continuous treatment — and suggests functional neuroplasticity, possibly via modulation of C and Aδ fibers in chronically hypostimulated plantar territory. Point selection was anatomically grounded, with ST-40, ST-34, LR-3, SP-6, KI-3, and the Bafeng extra points positioned close to the path of the fibular and tibial nerves, which gives mechanistic coherence to the proposal. The discrepancy between robust clinical improvement and absence of change in nerve conduction studies with NC-stat is, in itself, a relevant finding: it reaffirms that clinical and electrophysiological outcomes measure distinct dimensions of neuropathy, and that electroneurography does not capture all the functional recovery perceived by the patient.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice at the musculoskeletal pain outpatient clinic, diabetic neuropathy with predominantly negative symptoms — numbness, hypoesthesia, instability — is one of the diagnoses in which I usually have the most satisfaction in proposing acupuncture, precisely because the patient has already gone through the pharmacological arsenal without relevant sensory benefit. I have observed perceptible response from the fourth or fifth session, with the patient reporting reduced sensation of 'walking on cotton' — an almost universal complaint in this population. In general, a protocol of 10 to 12 weekly sessions is sufficient to consolidate the initial benefit, followed by monthly or bimonthly maintenance according to metabolic stability. I routinely combine sensorimotor physical therapy with proprioceptive training and plantar stimulation, potentiating sensory gains. The profile that responds best, in my experience, is the patient with reasonable glycemic control — HbA1c below 9% — and neuropathy with onset less than ten years ago. Very advanced neuropathies, with extensive axonal loss, respond less; in these cases, I redirect the focus to fall prevention. The 96.8% adherence reported in ACUDPN is consistent with what I observe: patients with DPN tend to deeply value any intervention that returns sensitivity, which favors adherence.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
World Journal of Diabetes · 2023
DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i12.1813
Access original articleThis study underpins the editorial content of the site.
Condition pages and clinical articles that cite this evidence as the basis of their recommendations.
Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories