acupuntura.com
LibraryAtlas
ExercisesNews
LibraryAtlas
ExercisesNews
acupuntura.com

Evidence-based medical acupuncture, physician-led at CEIMEC.

NAVIGATION

HomeArticlesConditionsAtlasMusclesExercises

CONTENT

NewsLibraryGuidesMultimodal

PATIENTS

SymptomsPain MapConditionsFAQFirst Session

INSTITUTIONAL

AboutTeamCEIMECWhy Trust Us

LEGAL

Editorial PolicyPrivacyTerms of UseLegal Notice

RESOURCE

Free Resource

No ads · No paywalls

01 · IDIOMA · LANGUAGE

Disponível em outras línguas

Disponible en otros idiomas

Available in other languages

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai·Physician Acupuncturist

DISCLAIMER Information on acupuntura.com is educational and does not replace consultation with a qualified physician. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have.

acupuntura.com · 2025–2026Last reviewed: 2026-05-04
Back to News
ResearchFull Analysis
April 7, 2026
6 min reading time

JAMA: Acupuncture Reduces Low Back Disability in Adults Aged 65 and Older

Multicenter pragmatic RCT with 800 patients across 4 US health systems shows that acupuncture reduced disability from chronic low back pain vs. usual care at 6 and 12 months

Source: JAMA Network Open(in English)DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.31348
JAMA: Acupuncture Reduces Low Back Disability in Adults Aged 65 and Older

Chronic low back pain is the leading cause of functional disability in older adults and one of the greatest challenges of healthy aging — especially because conventional pharmacologic options carry elevated risks in this population: anti-inflammatory drugs cause gastrointestinal bleeding and renal impairment, and opioids increase the risk of falls and dependence. A pragmatic randomized clinical trial published in JAMA Network Open— the largest ever conducted for this indication — demonstrates that acupuncture is effective and safe for adults aged 65 and older, reducing functional disability in a lasting manner over 12 months.

BACKINACTION TRIAL NUMBERS

800
PARTICIPANTS RANDOMIZED
Mean age of 73.6 years; 62% women
4
US HEALTH SYSTEMS
Multicenter study in 3 geographic regions
43.8%
CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENT
Enhanced acupuncture vs. 29.4% in usual care (6 months)
12 months
DURATION OF FOLLOW-UP
Benefit maintained on the primary disability outcome (RMDQ)

Study design

The BackInAction trial was conducted between August 2021 and November 2023 in four US health systems — Kaiser Permanente among them — and recruited 800 adults aged 65 and older with chronic low back pain (pain for more than three months). Participants were randomized into three arms:

  • Usual medical care (UMC): medications, physical therapy, and usual interventions — without acupuncture (n=266)
  • Standard acupuncture (SA): 8 to 15 sessions over 12 weeks, plus usual care (n=265)
  • Enhanced acupuncture (EA): standard acupuncture plus 4 to 6 maintenance sessions in the following 12 weeks — totaling 12 to 21 sessions (n=269)

The primary outcome was the change in the score of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ — 0 to 24 scale, higher = greater dysfunction). Clinically significant improvement was defined as a reduction ≥ 30% from baseline. Sessions were conducted by licensed and experienced acupuncturists from the community itself — not in an experimental context — which gives the trial high external validity for real practice.

Results

At 6 months, both acupuncture modalities were superior to usual care in low back disability. Standard acupuncture produced an adjusted mean difference (AMD) of -1.0 point in the RMDQ (95% CI: -1.9 to -0.1; p=0.002); enhanced acupuncture reached AMD of -1.5 points (95% CI: -2.5 to -0.6; p=0.002). This benefit was maintained consistently at 12 months: AMD of -1.2 for standard acupuncture and -1.7 for enhanced, both with p=0.002. The proportion of patients with clinically significant improvement (≥ 30%) was 39.1% (standard) and 43.8% (enhanced) versus only 29.4% in the usual-care group. Pain intensity and patient global impression also favored the enhanced acupuncture group over standard at 6 months. Anxiety symptoms improved in both acupuncture groups compared with usual care.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES

  • RMDQ (disability): acupuncture superior to usual care at 6 and 12 months (both p=0.002)
  • Clinically significant improvement (≥ 30%): SA 39.1%, EA 43.8% vs. UMC 29.4%
  • Pain intensity and global impression: EA superior to SA at 6 months
  • Anxiety symptoms: improvement in both acupuncture groups vs. UMC
  • Possibly related serious adverse events: <1%; mild events in 9.7% (discomfort at the needle site)

Safety profile

A central aspect for the use of acupuncture in older adults is safety. In this trial, fewer than 1% of participants reported serious adverse events possibly related to the intervention. Mild events — mainly transient discomfort at the insertion site — occurred in 9.7% of patients who received acupuncture. No serious complications were recorded. This comparison is relevant: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, widely used for low back pain in older adults, have clinically significant gastrointestinal and cardiovascular event rates in this age group. The principal investigator Dr. Lynn DeBar, of Kaiser Permanente, summarized: "Acupuncture offers a less invasive option with a better safety profile than many conventional treatments for low back pain in older adults."

INSIGHT

The BackInAction trial fills an important gap: until now, most acupuncture trials for low back pain excluded adults over 65 or underrepresented them. This study was designed specifically for this population, with community acupuncturists — not researchers — conducting the sessions, which increases the applicability of the results to real practice. From a clinical point of view, the most relevant datum is durability: the benefit on disability persisted at 12 months, indicating that the maintenance sessions of the enhanced protocol may be a valid strategy for patients with complex chronic low back pain. For physicians who follow older adults with polypharmacopathy, medical acupuncture emerges as a safe option to be considered in the integrated therapeutic plan.
— Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai · CRM-SP 158074 · RQE 65523 / 65524 / 655241

Context and clinical implications

Chronic low back pain affects approximately one third of adults over 65 and is the leading cause of disability in this age group. First-line pharmacologic treatments — anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids — have limited long-term efficacy and carry amplified risks in older adults: gastrointestinal bleeding, renal failure, falls, and dependence. The BackInAction trial positions acupuncture as a non-pharmacologic alternative with high-quality methodologic evidence for this specific population, published in the highest-impact general medicine journal in the world. The results reinforce the recommendations of guidelines such as those of the American College of Physicians, which already indicated non-pharmacologic interventions as first-line treatment for chronic low back pain.

KEY POINTS FOR THE PHYSICIAN

  • Largest RCT of acupuncture for chronic low back pain in older adults (n=800, 65+ years)
  • Benefit on disability (RMDQ) sustained at 6 and 12 months vs. usual care
  • Enhanced acupuncture (with maintenance sessions) superior to standard on pain and global impression
  • Favorable safety profile: no serious related events in >99% of participants
  • High external validity: conducted by licensed community acupuncturists, not in a laboratory
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS · 02

Frequently Asked Questions

In the standard protocol, between 8 and 15 sessions were performed over 12 weeks. In the enhanced protocol, 4 to 6 maintenance sessions were added in the following 12 weeks — totaling between 12 and 21 sessions. In clinical practice, the medical acupuncturist individually evaluates the therapeutic response to define the frequency and duration of treatment.

The results of this trial support the use of acupuncture as effective treatment — alone or combined — for chronic low back pain in older adults, with a safety profile superior to that of many drugs used in this population. The decision to integrate, replace, or combine treatments should be individualized by the physician, considering the patient’s history, comorbidities, tolerance, and preferences.

Fonte Original

JAMA Network Open(em inglês)

Estudo Científico

DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.31348Ver no PubMed
Content prepared by
CEIMEC — Centro de Estudo Integrado de Medicina Chinesa

Founded in 1989 by physicians trained at the University of São Paulo (USP) and specialized in China, CEIMEC is a Brazilian national reference in the teaching and practice of medical acupuncture. With more than 3,000 physicians trained over 35 years, it collaborates with HC-FMUSP and is recognized by the Brazilian Medical College of Acupuncture (CMBA/AMB).

Published on 2026-04-07

Learn More about this Topic

Related educational articles

Low Back Pain: Real Causes, Diagnosis, and Medical Treatment

Understand the causes, symptoms, and treatments for pain in the lumbar region — one of the most common complaints in clinical practice.

All News