Efficacy of a standardised acupuncture approach for women with bothersome menopausal symptoms: a pragmatic randomised study in primary care (the ACOM study)

Lund et al. · BMJ Open · 2019

⚖️Controlled RCT👥n=70 participants🏆High Clinical Impact

Evidence Level

STRONG
85/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
3/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of standardized acupuncture for women with moderate to severe menopausal symptoms

👥

WHO

70 women (40-65 years) with moderate to severe hot flashes

⏱️

DURATION

5 weekly treatments with 6-week follow-up

📍

POINTS

CV-3, CV-4, LR-8, SP-6, and SP-9 (standardized Western approach)

🔬 Study Design

70participants
randomization

Intervention Group

n=36

5 weekly sessions of standardized acupuncture

Control Group

n=34

Waiting list (treatment after 6 weeks)

⏱️ Duration: 6-week follow-up

📊 Results in numbers

0

Hot flash reduction

0

Day/night sweats reduction

0

Sleep problems reduction

0

Emotional symptoms reduction

0%

Reported beneficial effect

Percentage highlights

80%
Reported beneficial effect

📊 Outcome Comparison

Hot flashes (MenoScores scale)

Acupuncture
3.4
Control
5

Emotional symptoms (MenoScores scale)

Acupuncture
8.1
Control
11.5
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study showed that women in menopause who received acupuncture had significant reductions in their most bothersome symptoms, especially hot flashes, sweats, and sleep problems. The treatment was brief (only 5 sessions) and well tolerated, representing a safe option for those who cannot or do not wish to use hormone therapy.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

The ACOM study was a randomized controlled clinical trial conducted in nine primary care clinics in Denmark, investigating the efficacy of a standardized acupuncture protocol for women with moderate to severe menopausal symptoms. The research involved 70 women aged 40 to 65 years with significant hot flashes, with 36 allocated to the intervention group and 34 to the control group. The protocol used Western medical acupuncture with standardized points (CV-3, CV-4, LR-8, SP-6, and SP-9), administered by general practitioners with certified training in acupuncture. Treatment consisted of five weekly sessions of 15 minutes each, with needles retained for 10 minutes and manual stimulation to elicit the 'de-qi' sensation.

Outcomes were assessed using the MenoScores questionnaire, a validated instrument specific to menopausal symptoms. The primary outcome was reduction in hot flashes, while secondary outcomes included other domains such as night sweats, sleep problems, emotional symptoms, and physical symptoms. Results demonstrated significant efficacy of acupuncture compared with the control group. Hot flashes were reduced by 1.6 points on the scale (95% CI -2.3 to -0.8; p < 0.0001), with improvement already evident after just 3 weeks of treatment.

Other symptoms also showed statistically significant reductions: daytime and nighttime sweats (-1.2 points), general perspiration (-0.9 points), specific sleep problems related to menopause (-1.8 points), emotional symptoms (-3.4 points), physical symptoms (-1.7 points), and skin and hair changes (-1.5 points). Treatment adherence was exceptional, with only 4 participants withdrawing from the study and 34 of 36 women in the intervention group completing all five sessions. Questionnaire response rates were 100% at all assessment time points. Eighty percent of participants reported perceiving an overall beneficial effect from treatment.

Regarding safety, no serious adverse events were reported. Only four participants reported mild adverse effects: fatigue and headache, temporary increase in hot flashes related to stress, increased urinary frequency, and local tingling. One participant withdrew because she found needling uncomfortable. The clinical implications are important, especially considering that many women cannot or prefer not to use hormone therapy due to associated risks.

Acupuncture proved to be a pragmatic alternative, with a standardized protocol that can be easily implemented in primary care. The study stands out for its high methodologic quality, including adequate randomization, allocation concealment, blinding of outcome assessors and statistician, and use of a validated measurement instrument. The brief and standardized protocol enhances the applicability of the findings in real-world clinical practice, offering a new therapeutic option for women with moderate to severe menopausal symptoms.

Strengths

  • 1High methodologic quality with adequate randomization and allocation concealment
  • 2Pragmatic and standardized protocol easily implementable in clinical practice
  • 3Exceptional adherence (94% completed all sessions)
  • 4Use of a validated instrument specific to menopausal symptoms
  • 5Rapid effects observed as early as the third week of treatment
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Absence of an adequate placebo/sham group due to technical difficulty in acupuncture studies
  • 2Inability to blind participants and acupuncturists
  • 3Relatively brief intervention period (5 weeks)
  • 4No assessment of objective physiologic parameters
  • 5Placebo effect cannot be completely ruled out
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

The ACOM study fills a relevant practical gap: it offers a standardized protocol of five weekly sessions, applicable in primary care by physicians with certified training in acupuncture. For day-to-day clinical practice, this means we are not talking about an elaborate intervention that is difficult to replicate, but about a roadmap with fixed points — CV-3, CV-4, LR-8, SP-6, and SP-9 — feasible in 15 minutes per visit. The immediate impact is on the population of women aged 40 to 65 with moderate to severe symptoms who have contraindications to or refuse hormone therapy — whether due to a history of hormone-dependent cancer, thromboembolism, or simple personal preference. In this context, having a protocol with documented efficacy on hot flashes, sweats, sleep, and emotional symptoms considerably broadens the therapeutic arsenal of the physician who follows the woman through perimenopause and menopause.

Notable Findings

The finding that deserves special attention is the speed of response: improvement in hot flashes already evident in the third week, that is, after only three sessions. In terms of magnitude, the 3.4-point reduction in emotional symptoms was the most striking among all domains assessed by the MenoScores — even surpassing the reduction in hot flashes, which was the primary outcome. This finding suggests that acupuncture may have a particularly pronounced effect on the psychoaffective dimension of perimenopause, often underestimated and undertreated. The 80% rate of perceived overall benefit by participants, combined with 94% adherence to the full protocol, indicates that the intervention is well tolerated and clinically meaningful from the patient experience perspective — not just statistically.

From My Experience

In my practice at the Pain Center of HC-FMUSP, I have followed perimenopausal and menopausal women with refractory symptoms or with restrictions on hormone use, and the pattern I observe is consistent with what ACOM documents: the first responses usually appear between the third and fourth session, especially for hot flashes and sleep quality. For more lasting results, I usually work with cycles of eight to ten sessions, followed by monthly maintenance according to individual response. The standardized protocol of the study — with points from the Ren Mai meridian and the spleen-pancreas — is compatible with the approach we use, although we frequently combine it with additional points according to the patient's energetic pattern. I routinely combine acupuncture with sleep hygiene guidance and, when possible, regular physical activity. The profile with the best response, in my observation over the years, is the motivated patient, without concomitant use of high-dose antidepressants and with recent-onset symptoms — exactly the profile recruited in this trial.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

BMJ Open · 2019

DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023637

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.