Acupuncture and Doxylamine-Pyridoxine for Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy: A Randomized, Controlled, 2×2 Factorial Trial

Wu et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine · 2023

🔬Double-blind Factorial RCT👥n=352 participantsHigh Impact

Evidence Level

STRONG
85/ 100
Quality
5/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture and doxylamine-pyridoxine, alone or in combination, for moderate to severe nausea and vomiting in pregnancy

👥

WHO

352 Chinese pregnant women at 7-14 weeks of gestation with PUQE score ≥ 6

⏱️

DURATION

14 days of intervention with follow-up to delivery

📍

POINTS

PC-6, ST-36 (core) + CV-12, LR-3, ST-40 (adjunct, based on TCM patterns)

🔬 Study Design

352participants
randomization

Acupuncture + Doxylamine-Pyridoxine

n=88

True acupuncture + active medication

Sham + Doxylamine-Pyridoxine

n=88

Sham acupuncture + active medication

Acupuncture + Placebo

n=88

True acupuncture + placebo

Sham + Placebo

n=88

Sham acupuncture + placebo

⏱️ Duration: 14 days of treatment

📊 Results in numbers

−0.7 points

PUQE reduction — Acupuncture

−1.0 points

PUQE reduction — Doxylamine-Pyridoxine

−1.6 points

PUQE reduction — Combination

0%

Completion rate

OR 3.8

Small for gestational age

Percentage highlights

80.7%
Completion rate

📊 Outcome Comparison

Reduction in PUQE Score

Acupuncture + Doxylamine
5.7
Sham + Doxylamine
5
Acupuncture + Placebo
4.7
Sham + Placebo
4
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study shows that both acupuncture and the medication doxylamine-pyridoxine can help reduce nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. Although the benefits are modest when used alone, combining the two may provide greater symptom relief for pregnant women.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

# Acupuncture and Doxylamine-Pyridoxine for Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy: Evidence from a Large International Study

Nausea and vomiting during pregnancy are experienced by up to 85% of pregnant women and are most common between the sixth and eighth weeks of gestation. Although most cases are mild, approximately 10% of women develop moderate to severe symptoms that can significantly affect quality of life, capacity to work, and overall well-being. In more severe situations, some pregnant women even consider terminating desired pregnancies because of the intensity of symptoms. Despite this urgent need for effective treatments, safe and proven therapeutic options for pregnant women remain limited, creating an important challenge in obstetric clinical practice.

A recently published international study investigated two promising therapeutic approaches: acupuncture and the combination of doxylamine-pyridoxine, both individually and in combination. This research, conducted at 13 hospitals in China with 352 pregnant women, used a rigorous methodological design called a factorial clinical trial, which allowed simultaneous evaluation of the independent and combined effects of both treatments. Participants were divided into four groups: true acupuncture with doxylamine-pyridoxine, sham acupuncture with doxylamine-pyridoxine, true acupuncture with placebo, and sham acupuncture with placebo. Over 14 days, they received daily 30-minute acupuncture sessions and oral medication, with rigorous symptom monitoring through validated questionnaires.

The results showed that both acupuncture and doxylamine-pyridoxine, when used individually, produced statistically significant improvements in nausea and vomiting symptoms compared with controls. Acupuncture resulted in a mean reduction of 0.7 points on the symptom scale, while doxylamine-pyridoxine produced a 1.0-point reduction. Although these values may seem modest on a 15-point scale, they represent real symptom relief for many women. Even more encouraging was the finding that combining both treatments produced a 1.6-point reduction, suggesting complementary effects.

In addition to improvement in core symptoms, benefits were observed in quality of life, mood, and functional capacity of pregnant women.

For patients and healthcare professionals, these results provide robust scientific evidence on therapeutic options that may be considered in the management of pregnancy-related nausea and vomiting. Acupuncture emerges as a valid non-pharmacological alternative, especially for pregnant women who prefer to avoid medications or who have not had success with other approaches. Side effects of acupuncture were limited to small bruises and local discomfort at the application points. Doxylamine-pyridoxine, already recommended by international guidelines, also proved effective in this population, with side effects mainly related to drowsiness.

The possibility of combining both approaches may be particularly valuable for more resistant cases, offering a more comprehensive therapeutic strategy.

However, some aspects should be considered in interpreting these results. The study observed that about 70% to 85% of the improvement in active treatment groups was also present in control groups, indicating important effects related to the support provided and to the expectation of improvement. One finding that deserves attention was a slight increase in the proportion of small-for-gestational-age infants in the group receiving doxylamine-pyridoxine, although the number of cases was small and requires further investigation in future studies. Additionally, the intensive daily acupuncture protocol used in the study may not be easily replicable in all clinical settings, especially considering aspects of cost and availability of qualified professionals.

The study provides encouraging evidence that both acupuncture and doxylamine-pyridoxine represent valid therapeutic options for pregnant women with moderate to severe nausea and vomiting. Although individual benefits are modest, combining the approaches may offer more substantial relief. These findings are particularly relevant given the scarcity of safe and effective therapeutic options during pregnancy. For clinical practice, the results suggest that an individualized approach, considering patient preferences, symptom severity, and availability of resources, may optimize management of this common but potentially debilitating condition.

Strengths

  • 1Rigorous factorial design with adequate double-blinding
  • 2Robust sample of 352 participants
  • 3Personalized acupuncture protocol based on TCM patterns
  • 4Complete follow-up through perinatal outcomes
  • 5Multiple-imputation analysis for missing data
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Magnitude of effects was modest and of uncertain clinical importance
  • 2Sham acupuncture may have had active effects
  • 3Did not assess placebo effects or natural course of disease
  • 4Population limited to Chinese women
  • 5Intensive daily protocol may be impractical in some settings
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

Management of pregnancy-related nausea and vomiting remains one of the greatest challenges in obstetric practice, precisely because the safe pharmacologic arsenal is narrow and patient resistance to medication use in the first trimester is understandable. This factorial trial, conducted at 13 hospitals with 352 pregnant women and published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, positions acupuncture as a non-pharmacologic intervention with high-level evidence for this indication. The possibility of combining acupuncture and doxylamine-pyridoxine with an additive reduction of 1.6 points on the PUQE scale is clinically relevant for pregnant women with moderate to severe symptoms that compromise work, eating, and quality of life. For patients who refuse pharmacotherapy or who already use doxylamine-pyridoxine without satisfactory control, acupuncture now stands as an evidence-based option that can be integrated into the obstetric protocol from the first weeks of gestation.

Notable Findings

The 2×2 factorial design with adequate double-blinding allowed the effects of each intervention to be decomposed with unusual precision in the acupuncture literature. The most noteworthy finding is not the isolated magnitude of each arm — acupuncture at −0.7 points and doxylamine-pyridoxine at −1.0 points on the PUQE — but the approximately additive sum when the two are combined (−1.6 points), suggesting independent and complementary mechanisms of action. The acupuncture protocol was individualized according to Traditional Chinese Medicine patterns, which represents a courageous methodological choice faithful to real practice. The signal of an odds ratio of 3.8 for small-for-gestational-age infants in the doxylamine-pyridoxine group warrants prospective follow-up, although the absolute numbers are small. The 80.7% completion rate in a regimen of daily sessions for 14 days demonstrates good tolerability and adherence to the protocol.

From My Experience

In my practice with the Acupuncture Group at the Pain Center of HC-FMUSP, I have been seeing pregnant women referred by obstetrics for nausea and vomiting since the time when safety data on acupuncture in this population were still scarce. What this study's protocol does — daily sessions for 14 days with individualized points — is ambitious but not unrealistic for structured services. I usually observe a perceptible response after the third or fourth session, with patients reporting a reduction in episode frequency before any objective improvement in weight. For moderate cases, I usually work with series of 8 to 10 sessions and, depending on progress, space them to twice a week. I frequently associate small-meal dietary guidance, and when obstetrics has already prescribed doxylamine-pyridoxine, I keep both without hesitation — this study reinforces what we have empirically observed: the combination produces more relief than any monotherapy. The patient profile that responds best, in my experience, is the one with a stomach-cold pattern or Spleen-Stomach deficiency, where PC-6 and ST-36 structure the base protocol.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Annals of Internal Medicine · 2023

DOI: 10.7326/M22-2974

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.