Acupuncture for Menopausal Hot Flashes: A Randomized Trial

Ee et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine · 2016

🔬Double-Blind Controlled RCT👥n=327 participants⚖️High Quality of Evidence

Evidence Level

STRONG
85/ 100
Quality
5/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the efficacy of Chinese acupuncture vs. sham acupuncture for menopausal hot flashes

👥

WHO

327 postmenopausal women with kidney yin deficiency (mean age 55 years)

⏱️

DURATION

10 sessions over 8 weeks, 6-month follow-up

📍

POINTS

KI-6, KI-7, SP-6, HT-6, CV-4, LR-3

🔬 Study Design

327participants
randomization

True Acupuncture

n=163

Needling at traditional points with seeking of de qi (得氣)

Sham Acupuncture

n=164

Blunt non-penetrating needles at non-acupuncture points

⏱️ Duration: 8 weeks of treatment with 6-month follow-up

📊 Results in numbers

0

Hot flash score at end of treatment (acupuncture)

0

Hot flash score at end of treatment (sham)

0.33 (p=0.77)

Between-group difference

0%

Improvement in both groups

Percentage highlights

40%
Improvement in both groups

📊 Outcome Comparison

Hot Flash Score (End of Treatment)

Acupuncture
15.36
Sham
15.04
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study showed that traditional Chinese acupuncture was not superior to sham acupuncture for treating menopausal hot flashes. Both groups improved significantly (40%), suggesting that the benefits may be related to non-specific aspects of treatment. Acupuncture was safe, with no serious adverse effects.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This rigorous double-blind randomized clinical trial investigated the efficacy of traditional Chinese acupuncture for menopausal hot flashes, a condition that affects up to 75% of menopausal women and represents a considerable impact on quality of life. The study was motivated by the growing search for complementary therapies due to concerns about the adverse effects of hormone therapy.

The research involved 327 Australian postmenopausal women or women in late menopausal transition, with at least 7 moderate hot flashes daily, who met Chinese medicine criteria for kidney yin deficiency. The diagnosis followed structured methods of traditional Chinese medicine, including standardized questionnaires and tongue and pulse examination.

The experimental protocol compared standardized Chinese acupuncture versus non-invasive sham acupuncture using the validated Park device. The experimental group received needling at 6 specific points (KI-6, KI-7, SP-6, HT-6, CV-4, LR-3) with seeking of de qi (得氣) — the specific sensation considered essential in Chinese acupuncture. The control group received blunt needles at non-acupuncture points, creating a visual impression of insertion without actual skin penetration.

Both groups received 10 sessions over 8 weeks (twice weekly initially, then weekly), administered by qualified acupuncturists at 15 Australian clinics. Blinding was successful, with more than 60% of participants uncertain about which treatment they received.

The primary results showed no significant difference between groups in hot flash score at the end of treatment (15.36 vs 15.04, difference 0.33, p=0.77). Notably, both groups showed substantial improvement of approximately 40% relative to baseline, an effect that was maintained over 6 months of follow-up. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes such as quality of life, anxiety, or depression.

The safety profile was excellent, with no serious adverse events reported. Adverse events were mostly mild and intrinsic to acupuncture (minor bleeding, pain at the site).

This study has important methodological strengths: robust design, adequate statistical power, high retention rate (85% completed treatment), balanced groups, and prolonged follow-up. The integration of Chinese medicine principles into rigorous scientific design represented significant methodological advancement.

Limitations include a predominantly Caucasian population limiting generalizability, exclusion of women with surgical menopause or breast cancer, and a standardized protocol that does not fully reflect individualized clinical practice. Additionally, the sham control, although the best available, may have minor physiological effects.

The clinical implications are substantial: acupuncture with skin penetration offers no additional benefits over superficial needling for menopausal hot flashes. The robust 40% placebo effect observed in both groups suggests that non-specific factors (attention, expectation, therapeutic ritual) may be important components of the reported benefits of acupuncture.

This work contributes to the growing body of evidence questioning the superiority of true acupuncture over sham controls in various conditions, aligning with Cochrane reviews showing efficacy of acupuncture compared with no treatment but not versus sham. For physicians and patients, these findings suggest caution in recommending acupuncture specifically for menopausal hot flashes, although the safety profile remains favorable.

Strengths

  • 1Rigorous methodological design with adequate statistical power
  • 2Successful blinding and high retention rate
  • 3Integration of Chinese medicine principles with scientific methods
  • 4Prolonged 6-month follow-up
  • 5Multicenter design and representative sample
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Predominantly Caucasian population limiting generalizability
  • 2Sham control may have minor physiological effects
  • 3Standardized protocol does not reflect individualized clinical practice
  • 4Exclusion of women with surgical menopause or breast cancer
  • 5Inability to blind acupuncturists
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

Hot flashes affect up to 75% of women in menopausal transition and represent one of the complaints that most frequently reach us when the patient refuses or has a contraindication to hormone therapy. This randomized clinical trial, conducted at 15 Australian clinics with 327 participants and six-month follow-up, provides a methodologically solid answer to a question many colleagues ask in practice: does traditional Chinese acupuncture outperform sham control in these patients? The answer is no — both groups improved approximately 40% relative to baseline, with no difference between them at the end of eight weeks of treatment. For the physician caring for women in the climacteric, this datum reframes the conversation: it is not about discarding acupuncture, but about understanding that the observed benefit may largely derive from the therapeutic context, the attention given, and patient expectation, elements that compose any well-conducted clinical practice.

Notable Findings

The most noteworthy finding is not the absence of superiority of true acupuncture, but rather the magnitude and durability of the improvement shared by both groups — 40% reduction in the hot flash score, sustained over six months of follow-up. This is clinically relevant and not trivial. The design used the validated Park device for the sham group, ensuring successful blinding in more than 60% of participants, which makes the control genuinely rigorous. The experimental group was treated according to traditional Chinese medicine criteria for kidney yin deficiency, with specific points and seeking of de qi (得氣), giving the protocol validity within the very tenets of Chinese medicine. The safety profile was excellent, with no serious adverse events. The robustness of the effect in both arms raises serious questions about which components of the structured therapeutic encounter are responsible for the observed symptomatic improvement.

From My Experience

In my practice at the Pain Center of HC-FMUSP, I have followed women in the climacteric who arrive expressly requesting acupuncture after reading or hearing favorable accounts. In light of results such as those of this trial, my approach has become more transparent: I inform them that the benefit is real, but that part of it derives from the therapeutic ritual and structured attention, not exclusively from needling at specific points. I usually observe a subjective response within the first three to four sessions, and when I combine acupuncture with sleep hygiene counseling and, when indicated, supervised physical activity, patient satisfaction is notably greater. I prefer not to recommend acupuncture as a stand-alone substitute when hormone therapy is clearly the first-line option and there is no contraindication. The patient profile I perceive responds best is the one with high positive expectation, engagement in the process, and who values the time devoted to the consultation — which, curiously, this study helps explain.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Annals of Internal Medicine · 2016

DOI: 10.7326/M15-1380

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.