Acupuncture and other traditional Chinese medicine therapies in the treatment of children's tic syndrome: A network meta-analysis
Pu et al. · Frontiers in Neuroscience · 2023
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture, acupuncture + tuina, and acupuncture + Chinese medicine in the treatment of childhood tics compared with Western medication
WHO
Children with tic syndrome (mean age 8 years, 4:1 male-to-female ratio)
DURATION
Studies of 4 to 24 weeks of treatment
POINTS
Cervical Jiaji points, auricular points, and points to calm the liver and wind, with techniques varying by protocol
🔬 Study Design
Acupuncture + Chinese Medicine
n=1200
Acupuncture combined with Chinese herbs
Acupuncture + Tuina
n=600
Acupuncture with tuina massage
Acupuncture Alone
n=800
Acupuncture only
Western Medication
n=438
Haloperidol, thioridazine, or risperidone
📊 Results in numbers
Improvement in motor tics (YGTSS)
Improvement in vocal tics (YGTSS)
Clinical efficacy — acupuncture + Chinese medicine
Adverse events in the acupuncture group
Adverse events in the medication group
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Clinical Efficacy (SUCRA)
This large study showed that acupuncture, especially when combined with Chinese herbal medicine, can be very effective for reducing tics in children. The treatment had fewer adverse effects than conventional medications and significantly improved both motor and vocal tics.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Childhood tic syndrome is a neuropsychiatric disorder that primarily affects preschool- and school-age children, manifesting through rapid involuntary muscle movements, which can be motor or vocal. This condition has shown a gradual increase in incidence in recent years, reaching up to 6.1% of preschool children, with male predominance in a ratio of approximately 4:1. Tic syndrome can cause significant impacts on children's development, learning, and emotional state, and approximately one-third of cases may persist into adulthood. Conventional treatment with Western medications, although effective, often presents adverse effects such as drowsiness and nausea, leading parents and children to seek less invasive therapeutic alternatives.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture and other traditional Chinese medicine therapies in the treatment of tic syndrome in children, through a network meta-analysis. The researchers performed a comprehensive search of eight scientific databases, from the inception of each database through November 2022, including Chinese and international literature. Only randomized controlled clinical trials comparing different acupuncture modalities (simple acupuncture, acupuncture combined with Chinese herbal medicine, or acupuncture combined with tuina) with conventional Western medications such as haloperidol, tiapride, and risperidone were selected. Study quality was assessed using standardized tools from the Cochrane Collaboration, and results were analyzed using specialized statistical software for network meta-analysis.
Thirty-nine studies involving 3,038 patients were included, all conducted in China. The analysis demonstrated that acupuncture combined with Chinese herbal medicine produced the best results across multiple assessment parameters. On the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale, which is the main measurement instrument for this condition, the acupuncture-herbal medicine combination showed superiority for both motor and vocal tics, as well as on the total scale score. Similarly, on the traditional Chinese medicine syndrome scale, which assesses specific symptoms such as head shaking and shoulder shrugging, laryngeal vocalization, and agitation, the combination with Chinese herbal medicine consistently maintained the best results.
The clinical efficacy rate was also superior in the group that received acupuncture combined with Chinese medications. Both simple acupuncture and acupuncture combined with tuina massage also demonstrated efficacy superior to conventional medications, although to a lesser degree than the combination with herbal medicine.
From a clinical standpoint, these results suggest that acupuncture, especially when combined with traditional Chinese herbal medicine, can represent a valuable therapeutic alternative for children with tic syndrome. The main advantage observed was the significant reduction of adverse effects compared with conventional medications. While the Western medications group had 191 cases of adverse effects such as dizziness, nausea, drowsiness, fatigue, and dry mouth, the acupuncture groups had only 33 cases of adverse reactions. This represents an important improvement in treatment safety and greater acceptance by patients and families.
For health professionals, these findings indicate that the integration of traditional Chinese medicine techniques may complement or, in some cases, replace conventional therapies, offering a more holistic approach with a lower adverse-effect profile. The combination of acupuncture with herbal medicine appears particularly promising, possibly due to the synergistic effect between the two modalities.
However, it is important to recognize the limitations of this research. Most of the included studies presented variable methodologic quality, with problems in describing randomization methods and difficulties in applying blinding procedures, which are inherent to the characteristics of acupuncture and massage therapies. In addition, all studies were conducted in China, which may limit generalization of the results to other populations and health systems. Heterogeneity among studies in terms of inclusion criteria and definitions of clinical efficacy may also have influenced the results.
Another aspect to consider is that the number of studies evaluating acupuncture combined with tuina was smaller compared with the other modalities, which may not provide sufficient evidence for definitive conclusions about this approach. Future studies with greater methodologic rigor, including multicenter trials with larger samples and more robust methodology, are needed to confirm these promising findings and establish standardized protocols for the clinical use of these therapies in the treatment of childhood tic syndrome.
Strengths
- 1Largest meta-analysis to date with 3,038 children
- 2Network analysis allowing comparison among different modalities
- 3Low incidence of adverse events with acupuncture
- 4Consistent results across multiple outcomes
Limitations
- 1All studies were conducted in China
- 2Inability to adequately blind acupuncture studies
- 3Heterogeneity in efficacy criteria across studies
- 4Variable methodologic quality of included studies
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
Childhood tic syndrome, with a prevalence of up to 6.1% among preschoolers and male predominance of 4:1, represents a real therapeutic challenge in the pediatric neurology and rehabilitation outpatient setting. The conventional pharmacologic arsenal — haloperidol, risperidone — carries an adverse-effect profile that often precludes adherence: drowsiness, weight gain, and extrapyramidal symptoms are concrete barriers. This network meta-analysis with 3,038 children positions acupuncture, especially when combined with Chinese herbal medicine, as an alternative with measurable efficacy on the YGTSS, with adverse events of only 1.6% compared with 16.2% in the medication group. For families who refuse first-line medication, or for children with moderate tics without an imperative indication for antipsychotics, these data support offering acupuncture within a structured treatment plan, not as a last-resort option, but as a primary integrated option.
▸ Notable Findings
The most striking finding is not just the magnitude of improvement — 4.90 points in motor tics and 4.03 in vocal tics on the YGTSS — but the hierarchy established by the network analysis among the modalities. The combination of acupuncture with herbal medicine consistently outperformed acupuncture alone and acupuncture with tuina across multiple outcomes, including the TCM syndrome scale, which captures symptoms such as head movement and laryngeal vocalization. This suggests a pharmacologic-neuromodulator synergistic effect that goes beyond the needle effect alone. Equally relevant is the dramatic contrast in safety: 33 adverse events in total across the acupuncture groups versus 191 in the pharmacologic group. In a pediatric population in active neurocognitive development, where sedation and metabolic effects carry particular weight, this difference is not abstract statistics — it is clinically determinant in the therapeutic choice.
▸ From My Experience
In my rehabilitation and pain practice, I have been asked to collaborate with pediatric neurologists in tic cases precisely when the family arrives in crisis with the adverse effects of medication. What I routinely see is that children with axial motor tics — neck, shoulder — respond quite perceptibly between the fourth and sixth acupuncture sessions, with reductions in frequency and intensity that the parents themselves spontaneously report. I usually work with protocols of 12 to 16 weekly sessions as the initial phase, followed by biweekly maintenance for another two to three months, accompanied by YGTSS reassessment. The combination with a behavioral approach — counseling parents to avoid attentional reinforcement of tics — enhances results in a way that no isolated intervention can achieve. The profile of child who responds best, in my observation, is the one with simple or chronic tics without severe ADHD comorbidity, where the somatic tension component is evident. In cases with associated ADHD of greater intensity, acupuncture enters as an adjunct without replacing pharmacotherapy.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Frontiers in Neuroscience · 2023
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1156308
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories