Electroacupuncture and Manual Acupuncture Increase Joint Flexibility but Reduce Muscle Strength
Kim et al. · Healthcare · 2020
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
To investigate the immediate effects of electroacupuncture versus manual acupuncture on hip flexibility, knee function, and quadriceps strength
WHO
45 healthy adults (23.4 ± 3.0 years) with no history of spine or lower-extremity injuries
DURATION
Single 15-minute session with 40-minute follow-up
POINTS
Individualized points based on physical examination: SP-9/10/11, ST-31/34/36, GB-30/31/34
🔬 Study Design
Control
n=13
No treatment, supine rest
Electroacupuncture
n=18
Acupuncture + 170 Hz electrical stimulation
Manual acupuncture
n=14
Traditional acupuncture with manual manipulation
📊 Results in numbers
Increase in hip flexibility (electroacupuncture)
Increase in hip flexibility (manual)
Reduction in quadriceps strength (electroacupuncture)
Reduction in quadriceps strength (manual)
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Hip range of motion (degrees)
This study showed that both electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture can immediately increase hip flexibility but may temporarily reduce muscle strength. The effects on flexibility persist for at least 40 minutes after treatment.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Acupuncture is widely known for its potential for pain relief, but its effects on muscle function and joint mobility have attracted growing scientific interest. For people who engage in physical activity or face mobility limitations, understanding how different acupuncture techniques can influence flexibility and muscle strength is essential to guide therapeutic decisions. Electroacupuncture, which combines needle insertion with electrical stimulation, could theoretically offer benefits superior to traditional manual acupuncture, but this hypothesis still required rigorous scientific investigation.
This study was conducted by Korean investigators with the aim of investigating the immediate effects of electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture on hip flexibility, knee function, and quadriceps strength in healthy adults. The study followed a randomized controlled design involving 45 neurologically healthy participants with a mean age of 23 years. The distinguishing feature of this investigation was the individualized selection of acupuncture points based on specific physical examinations, reflecting real clinical practice in which each person receives personalized treatment. Participants underwent three physical tests assessing flexibility and muscle strength to determine which acupuncture points would be used.
Each person was randomly assigned to one of three groups: control (no treatment), electroacupuncture, or manual acupuncture, all lasting 15 minutes. Measurements of hip range of motion, knee joint function, and quadriceps strength and activation were taken before treatment and at 0, 20, and 40 minutes after its conclusion.
The results revealed important and seemingly contradictory findings. Both electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture produced immediate increases in hip flexibility, with improvements of 4 degrees with electroacupuncture and 5.4 degrees with manual acupuncture. These flexibility gains were maintained throughout the 40-minute observation period, suggesting a lasting treatment effect. Surprisingly, both techniques also caused reductions in quadriceps strength, with decreases of approximately 9% immediately after electroacupuncture treatment and 8.7% after 40 minutes with manual acupuncture.
Knee joint function and muscle activation showed no significant changes. No clear differences in superiority were found between electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture.
For patients and clinicians, these findings have important practical implications. Increased hip flexibility may be beneficial for people with muscle stiffness, athletes seeking improved range of motion, or individuals undergoing rehabilitation. Acupuncture may be a valuable tool to improve joint mobility quickly and durably. However, the reduction in muscle strength immediately after treatment should be carefully considered.
This means that activities requiring maximum quadriceps strength should be avoided right after acupuncture sessions. For athletes, it may be advisable to schedule treatments during periods that do not precede competitions or high-intensity training. The choice between electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture can be based on patient preference and equipment availability, since both demonstrated similar efficacy.
The study has limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. The sample size, although statistically adequate, may not be sufficient for broad generalizations. The single 15-minute duration may not reflect typical clinical protocols, which often involve multiple sessions. The absence of a sham acupuncture group precludes a complete assessment of placebo effects.
In addition, all participants were young, healthy adults, limiting the applicability to populations with specific clinical conditions. Personalized point selection, while reflecting real practice, may have introduced variability into the results. Future studies should explore the effects of multiple treatments, investigate different populations, and compare individualized versus standardized approaches. Despite these limitations, the research offers valuable evidence on the immediate effects of acupuncture on musculoskeletal function, supporting the clinical practice of individualizing treatment based on individual physical assessment.
Strengths
- 1Individualized point selection based on physical examination
- 2Direct comparison between electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture
- 3Objective measurements with precise equipment
- 4Adequate temporal follow-up to assess persistence of effects
Limitations
- 1Small sample of young healthy adults
- 2Only one 15-minute treatment session
- 3Absence of a sham group to control for placebo effect
- 4Results may not apply to patients with pathology
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
The most operationally relevant finding of this work is the dissociation between mobility and strength immediately after the session: gains of 4.0° to 5.4° in hip range of motion coexisting with a drop of approximately 9% in quadriceps strength, both persisting through the 40 minutes of observation. For the physiatrist working in musculoskeletal rehabilitation, this reframes the ideal timing of acupuncture within the therapy session. Patients with restricted hip mobility — early post-arthroplasty, patellofemoral syndrome, low-back pain with hamstring tightness — may benefit from the immediate range-of-motion gain as a window for the kinetic-functional work that follows. The practical caveat is clear: acupuncture sessions should not precede maximum-strength exercises or functional testing on the same day, especially in athletes during competitive periods or patients in advanced strengthening phases.
▸ Notable Findings
The equivalence between 170 Hz electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture in flexibility and strength reduction deserves attention. Clinically, we would expect high-frequency electrical stimulation, with its preferential effect on Aβ fibers and potential modulation of the muscle spindle, to produce responses different from manual manipulation — and the data did not confirm that hierarchy. The finding suggests that the common mechanism may lie in segmental reflex modulation and inhibition of muscle tone via inhibitory interneurons, regardless of activation modality. Equally notable is the absence of effect on quadriceps electromyographic activation: strength fell without central activation changing significantly, which points to a peripheral mechanism — possibly an alteration in muscle viscoelastic properties or transient arthrogenic inhibition — rather than cortical suppression.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice, this pattern of immediate gain in range of motion with transient reduction in strength is something I observe routinely, although we have rarely measured it as objectively as here. I usually see a perceptible response in mobility within the first or second session in patients with functional joint restriction, while analgesic and strength outcomes take an average of four to six sessions to consolidate. For this reason, at the Pain Center, we structure the protocol so that acupuncture precedes mobilization-based therapy rather than resistance exercises — exactly what these data support. For in-season athletes, I recommend the session the day before technical or mobility training, never the day before a 1RM test or sprint. The patient profile that benefits most from this sequence, in my experience, is the runner with piriformis syndrome or the swimmer with functional femoroacetabular impingement: the mobility window opened by acupuncture allows progression in range of motion that would otherwise take weeks.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Healthcare · 2020
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare8040414
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories