Acupuncture: Its Place in the History of Chinese Medicine

Ma KW · Acupuncture in Medicine · 2000

📚Historical Review🏛️Documentary Analysis🎓Academic Lecture

Evidence Level

STRONG
85/ 100
Quality
5/5
Sample
3/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

Document the historical role of acupuncture in traditional Chinese medicine

👥

WHO

Chinese civilization since the Neolithic period

⏱️

DURATION

More than 4,000 years of history

📍

POINTS

From Bian Shi (stones) to 359 systematized points

🔬 Study Design

0participants
randomization
⏱️ Duration: Historical analysis spanning millennia

📊 Results in numbers

0

Points systematized in the Neijing

0

Points in the Zhenjiu Jiayi Jing

0

Points in the Tong Ren (1026 AD)

618 AD

First official department

📊 Outcome Comparison

Evolution of the number of points throughout history

Neijing (5th-1st century BC)
295
Jiayi Jing (260 AD)
349
Tong Ren (1026 AD)
359
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study documents how acupuncture developed over more than 4,000 years in China, from the use of sharpened stones to becoming an official medical discipline recognized by the government. The research shows that acupuncture was not only one of the earliest forms of medicine in China, but also became fundamental to the entire Chinese medical system.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This comprehensive historical article, based on a commemorative lecture to the British Medical Acupuncture Society, meticulously documents the central role of acupuncture in traditional Chinese medicine over more than four millennia. The author Kan-Wen Ma presents compelling evidence that acupuncture was one of the earliest healing arts in China, possibly predating even moxibustion and herbal medicine. The historical analysis reveals that legendary figures such as Fu Xi, Shen Nong, and the Yellow Emperor were credited as pioneers of acupuncture, reflecting the ancestral origins of this therapeutic practice. Substantial archaeological evidence documents the use of 'Bian Shi' (stone needles) during the Neolithic period, with numerous artifacts discovered at various sites in China.

The transition from stone needles to bronze and gold instruments during the Xia and Shang dynasties marked a significant advance in the practice of acupuncture. The development of meridian theory and acupuncture points found its definitive systematization in the Huangdi Neijing (Yellow Emperor's Inner Classic), a foundational work that established 295 points and 12 regular meridians. This work not only codified existing knowledge, but also integrated Chinese philosophical principles such as Yin-Yang and the Five Elements into acupuncture practice. Official recognition of acupuncture as a specialized medical discipline occurred during the Tang dynasty (618 AD), when the first governmental department of acupuncture was established with professors, assistants, and students.

This historical milestone demonstrates the institutional importance that acupuncture achieved in Chinese society. The Song dynasty (960-1127) witnessed extraordinary developments, including the creation of the famous bronze figures by Wang Weiyi in 1026, which systematized 359 acupuncture points. These figures, filled with water and covered with wax, were innovatively used for teaching and evaluating students. The article highlights the international dissemination of acupuncture, particularly to Japan in the 6th century, where it was incorporated into the official Japanese medical system.

Notable physicians such as Bian Que, Hua Tuo, and Sun Simiao contributed significantly to the refinement of acupuncture techniques and theories. The clinical implications of this historical analysis are profound, demonstrating that acupuncture was not merely a complementary therapy, but rather a central medical discipline that influenced the entire development of Chinese medicine. The continued governmental recognition and institutionalization of acupuncture education throughout the dynasties evidence its recognized clinical efficacy. The limitations of this study include reliance on Chinese historical sources and the difficulty of independently verifying some ancient claims, although substantial archaeological evidence supports the main conclusions.

Strengths

  • 1Comprehensive historical documentation with archaeological evidence
  • 2Analysis of primary sources and classical Chinese texts
  • 3Clear demonstration of the evolution and institutionalization of acupuncture
  • 4Contextualization within the development of Chinese medicine
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Reliance primarily on Chinese sources
  • 2Some ancient historical claims are difficult to verify
  • 3Does not address modern developments in acupuncture
  • 4Limited focus on the Chinese cultural perspective
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

Understanding the historical genealogy of acupuncture is not an exercise in scholarship for scholarship's sake — it is a foundation for contemporary medical practice. When a colleague questions the rationale of a particular point or protocol, knowing that the system of 12 meridians and 295 points was codified in the Huangdi Neijing after centuries of empirical clinical observation lends substance to the dialogue. Official recognition by the Tang dynasty in 618 AD, with a governmental department, faculty, and structured training program, anticipates by more than a millennium the institutionalization of many Western medical specialties. For the physician integrating acupuncture into the current therapeutic arsenal, this trajectory demonstrates that the systematization of points — culminating in the 359 of the Tong Ren of 1026 AD — was not arbitrary, but the product of clinical refinement accumulated over generations of physicians.

Notable Findings

The archaeological demonstration of the use of Bian Shi — Neolithic stone needles — as precursors to metallic instruments places acupuncture among the oldest documented therapeutic technologies of humanity, possibly predating moxibustion and herbal pharmacology. The numerical progression of systematized points is revealing: 295 in the Neijing, 349 in the Zhenjiu Jiayi Jing, and 359 in Wang Weiyi's Tong Ren of 1026 AD, evidencing a continuous process of clinical discovery and validation — not a static revelation. Particularly notable is the use of bronze figures filled with water and covered with wax for objective student evaluation: this represents structured clinical simulation in the midst of the Song dynasty, demonstrating that concern with verifiable technical competence is as old as the discipline itself. The dissemination to Japan in the 6th century, with incorporation into the official Japanese medical system, anticipates the phenomenon of globalization of medical knowledge that we observe today on a different scale.

From My Experience

In my trajectory at the Acupuncture Group of the Pain Center at HC-FMUSP, I have turned to historical reviews such as this one by Ma precisely at moments when the team needs to reconnect daily practice with its conceptual foundations. When we initiate a resident into the logic of meridians and point selection, contextualizing that this system was built empirically over millennia — and not speculatively postulated — completely changes the learner's clinical posture toward theory. I have observed that physicians with solid historical training make more coherent therapeutic decisions and better justify their point selections to skeptical colleagues. We usually reserve one session of the training program exclusively for this historical-epistemological perspective, and the impact on the quality of subsequent clinical reasoning is perceptible. The millennia-old institutionalization described in the article also serves as a consistent argument in discussions about integrating acupuncture into formal hospital protocols.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Acupuncture in Medicine · 2000

DOI: 10.1136/aim.18.2.88

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.